Good morning,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:54 PM Köditz, Martin wrote:
>
> Hi Kalle,
>
> > With all this being said; there is however one option in case the vote
> > passes when it ends in about a weeks time.
> > That is for the Firebird Foundation to take over control of the extension
> > on PECL
I like it. Only exception is:
```
fn&() => ...;
```
Which I would prefer to see reserved for the purpose that you've written as:
```
fn() use(&) => ...;
```
The & symbol of "return by ref", should be placed on the right of the
parentheses, near the return type:
```
fn(int &$x)&: int => $x;
fn(
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> So, there's been quite a bit of extra discussion here... unfortunately I
> can't say that it really clarified anything, we're still circling around
> different syntax choices, with the main contenders being fn, \ and ==>.
>
> fn($x) => $x
>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, at 6:48 AM, Benjamin Morel wrote:
> Even though I was originally hoping for something closer to JS syntax,
> considering Nikita's summary it looks like the best contender is still
> fn(), as originally proposed.
> At least it looks like a function indeed, to the uninitiated.
>
On Di, 2019-04-16 at 23:49 +0100, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> I'm pretty sure one of the big goals that the PHP project should try
> to accomplish over the next year or two is to allow extensions to be
> distributed through channels similar to Composer.
In reality 90% of users use Linux (or *BSD or Mac b
Hi
Den ons. 17. apr. 2019 kl. 09.54 skrev Köditz, Martin
:
> By the way:
> Pierre Joye mentioned to request access via a github account at
> https://www.php.net/git-php.php. I read the complete instruction. But I'm
> still unable to process successfully. I always get an error saying the answer
Hi internals,
I've opened voting on the arrow functions RFC. The vote closes May 1st.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrow_functions_v2#vote
The RFC uses the fn($x, $y) => $x*$y syntax as originally proposed.
Regards,
Nikita
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:12 AM Lauri Kenttä
wrote:
> On 2019-04-09 12:54, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > Inspired by Bob's recent RFC for concat precedence, I'd like to propose
> > a
> > deprecation and removal of the left-associative behavior of ternaries.
> > Instead, explicit parentheses should be
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:23 AM Björn Larsson
wrote:
> Den 2019-04-14 kl. 18:52, skrev Nikita Popov:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:06 PM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:56 PM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi internals,
> >>>
> >>> Motivated by the recent list compreh
Den 2019-04-14 kl. 18:52, skrev Nikita Popov:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:06 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:56 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
Motivated by the recent list comprehensions RFC, I think it's time we
took another look at short closures:
https://wiki.php.ne
10 matches
Mail list logo
