On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:50 AM Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > I want to do RFS proposal for new language concept - Class extension
> > functions.
> >
> > Syntax will looks like:
> >
> > function DateTime->localTime() {
> > return $this->format('H:i');
> > }
>
> I feel this is inviting trouble.
On 25.09.2018 at 08:50, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> I want to do RFS proposal for new language concept - Class extension
>> functions.
>>
>> Syntax will looks like:
>>
>> function DateTime->localTime() {
>> return $this->format('H:i');
>> }
>
> I think this wouldn't add much what we already
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 22:48, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> There might be a compromise here, which is to only perform a ctor
> initialization check and forbid explicit unset()s if the class does not use
> property accessors (i.e. does not define __get). This allows the lazy
> initialization pattern bu
On 12.07.2018 at 21:14, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Sounds good. Anybody wants to help with writing the text for the call
> (it should include some explanations about what it is about and what the
> person is to do) […]
Okay, a first draft for the call for maintainership:
| The extension which
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:02 PM Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > We have deprecated and moved to PECL a number of extensions in the
> > recent past. These were mysql and ereg in PHP 7.0 and mcrypt in PHP 7.2.
> > I have always understood these moves as "sunsetting" the extensions, in
> > the
On 19.09.2018 at 00:24, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> Hmm, I have some doubts that it's okay for users if we remove the WDDX
>> extension in PHP 7.4 without any deprecation phase. Is there any
>
> I think deprecation phase is necessary for features that are being
> removed. For extension being mo
