Kia ora,
I'm requesting access to wiki to be able to write the RFC on
implementing missing pdo_sqlite features, following pull request
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2698 and discussion on this list.
My account on the wiki is "bohwaz".
Cheers.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developmen
This discussion made me have another look at the Generics RFC,
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generics
It seems to me that the proposal violates LSP, because it does not
correctly implement contravariance.
Look at the part where it talks about instanceof.
interface Feline {}
class Cat implements Feline
Hi Hannes,
I replied to your reply below on 16-Aug. Has there been any progress in
getting the subscriber list working?
Alan
On 8/16/2017 10:25 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
how are you trying to subscribe?
Are you submitting the http://php.net/mailing-lists.php form? In which
case, which
Results for project PHP master, build date 2017-08-23 19:23:20-07:00
commit: cf1d42e
previous commit:3cb6407
revision date: 2017-08-24 02:31:52+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:55:10 +0200 / "Christoph M. Becker"
said :
> It seems to me this is rather simple: if a feature is uncontroversial,
> it doesn't need an RFC. Since nobody objected against PR #2528, it
> was merged (after some weeks). However, there have been objections
> against PR #2698
On 24.08.2017 at 00:06, Adam Baratz wrote:
>> That change was implemented in the SQLite3 extension without a RFC, so I'm
>> quite confused here.
>
> My literal reading of the contribution guide[1] is that new features should
> be preceded by an RFC, though there are certainly cases where this doe
