[PHP-DEV] BAD Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2017-07-12

2017-07-13 Thread lp_benchmark_robot
Results for project PHP master, build date 2017-07-12 19:23:15-07:00 commit: 09d3b73 previous commit:d1ee666 revision date: 2017-07-12 18:53:16+03:00 environment:Haswell-EP cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB

Re: [PHP-DEV] array coalesce operator concept

2017-07-13 Thread Walter Parker
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Tony Marston wrote: > "David Rodrigues" wrote in message news:CAEsg9X2ECG62i7Z_Nu11kqr7 > yvbkmucd3mxgt78ulampfx-...@mail.gmail.com... > >> >> The idea is good, but I don't know if it is more clear than an 'if()' >> > > I think that this proposal is totally ridic

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Distrust SHA-1 Certificates

2017-07-13 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi, > After reading related discussion on openssl-users [1], I'm not so sure > if > we should be doing that at all... > > Especially I agree with this bit: > > "Making your code more complex is a far higher risk than a practical > certificate forgery based on a col

Re: [PHP-DEV] array coalesce operator concept

2017-07-13 Thread Tony Marston
"David Rodrigues" wrote in message news:caesg9x2ecg62i7z_nu11kqr7yvbkmucd3mxgt78ulampfx-...@mail.gmail.com... The idea is good, but I don't know if it is more clear than an 'if()' I think that this proposal is totally ridiculous and should be shot down in flames. My reasoning is as follows:

Re: [PHP-DEV] array coalesce operator concept

2017-07-13 Thread Niklas Keller
> > 2017-07-12 22:14 GMT+02:00 Niklas Keller : > > > 2017-07-12 17:26 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzuchalski < > > michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com>: > > > >> 12.07.2017 15:35 "Mark Shust" napisał(a): > >> > > >> > Hi Aidan, > >> > > >> > I think you are correct on all points. The initial emit is just a > >> wa

Re: [PHP-DEV] array coalesce operator concept

2017-07-13 Thread Michał Brzuchalski
2017-07-12 22:14 GMT+02:00 Niklas Keller : > 2017-07-12 17:26 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzuchalski < > michal.brzuchal...@gmail.com>: > >> 12.07.2017 15:35 "Mark Shust" napisał(a): >> > >> > Hi Aidan, >> > >> > I think you are correct on all points. The initial emit is just a >> warning, >> > so I think