Hi all,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Lauri Kenttä
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-01-30 04:25, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>>>
I'll prepare patch that allows int array
initialization
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
> On 01/02/2017 20:17, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
>> You probably think of $var as being a local scope variable here,
>> but really it isn't. It is an imported variable that happened to not exist
>> in the outer scope and it was assigned a value i
On 31.01.2017 at 23:49, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 23:46 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 19:33 +, Rowan Collins wrote:
>>> Currently, if the constant FROB_ACTIVE is not defined, the code "echo
>>> FROB_ACTIVE;" results in an E_NOTICE and the st
On 01/02/2017 20:17, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
You probably think of $var as being a local scope variable here,
but really it isn't. It is an imported variable that happened to not exist
in the outer scope and it was assigned a value in the inner scope, but that
assignment can't leak back out so it i
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Bruce Weirdan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 07:45:50AM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > The reason it is feasible to do this for single-expression closures in
> this
> > short form syntax is that you don't typically need a local scope at all
> for
> > these shor
On 2/1/2017 2:44 PM, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On 31 January 2017 23:02:07 GMT+00:00, Ryan Pallas
> wrote:
>> I would say compareTo makes sense, because that's what you're
>> asking the method to do. Methods aren't usually past tense as it
>> would seem weird.
>
> To be specific, methods are general
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 07:45:50AM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> The reason it is feasible to do this for single-expression closures in this
> short form syntax is that you don't typically need a local scope at all for
> these short closures and the syntax doesn't convey the idea that you would
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> That's the idea. I'd prefer it if auto-capture was not restricted to
> single-expression functions (“arrow functions”). Though arrow functions
> make most sense with auto-capture, it doesn't need to be stricted to them.
This goes against
On 31 January 2017 23:02:07 GMT+00:00, Ryan Pallas wrote:
>I would say compareTo makes sense, because that's what you're asking
>the
>method to do. Methods aren't usually past tense as it would seem weird.
To be specific, methods are generally named as "imperative" phrases, because
they are inst
