Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
> On 05.07.2016 at 16:32, Leigh wrote:
>
>> On 5 July 2016 at 04:02, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>> We can argue about the provided pnrng being CS but it is not php's job to
>>> decide.
>>
>> I think we need to drop the concerns abou
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:51 PM, André Rømcke wrote:
> Hello PHP Team,
>
> Even if to late for 7.1, it’s summer time and I’d like to contribute to
> moving forward on updating a RFC for Property Accessors Syntax
> to bring that up to level of 7.x.
>
> I’m not a C programmer so I’m interested in fi
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Михаил Востриков <
michael.vostri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please give me RFC karma. My wiki account is "michael-vostrikov". I plan to
> create an RFC for this feature.
>
>
hi,
I've just granted you with rfc karma on the wiki.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://ty
Hi!
> Some of us worried about CSPRNG state exposure. I'm wondering how many
> of you will vote in favor if I change the RFC to use hash functions
> optionally. This means code and INI settings related to hash function
> selection will remain. Please note that ext/hash is not built always.
> If yo
> Another (minor) issue I have with the RFC is the introduction of
> ReflectionNamedType. A simpler alternative appears to be to add the
> getName() method to ReflectionType; for unnamed types this could simply
> return (string) $reflectionType. That might not be the most farsighted
> design deci
> Or if the aim is to simplify the reflection usage, why require the if
> statement at all:
>
> try {
> $r = $type->getReflectionClass();
> } catch ( ReflectionException $e ) {
> // type is builtin or refers to an undefined class
> }
I don't think this is actually simpler if you expand the
Hi!
> Some of us worried about CSPRNG state exposure. I'm wondering how many
> of you will vote in favor if I change the RFC to use hash functions
> optionally. This means code and INI settings related to hash function
> selection will remain. Please note that ext/hash is not built always.
> If yo
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
On 05.07.2016 at 16:32, Leigh wrote:
On 5 July 2016 at 04:02, Pierre Joye wrote:
We can argue about the provided pnrng being CS but it is not php's job to
decide.
I think we need to drop the concerns about exposing "RNG state".
A reminder of what
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Björn Larsson
> wrote:
> > Den 2016-06-30 kl. 23:57, skrev Nikita Popov:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> >>
> >>> The RFC for improving ReflectionType[1] is now in voting ph
On 05.07.2016 at 16:32, Leigh wrote:
> On 5 July 2016 at 04:02, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> We can argue about the provided pnrng being CS but it is not php's job to
>> decide.
>
> I think we need to drop the concerns about exposing "RNG state".
>
> A reminder of what php_random_bytes looks at (in or
On 05.07.2016 at 15:21, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Björn Larsson
> wrote:
>> Den 2016-06-30 kl. 23:57, skrev Nikita Popov:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>>
The RFC for improving ReflectionType[1] is now in voting phase. The
Hello PHP Team,
Even if to late for 7.1, it’s summer time and I’d like to contribute to
moving forward on updating a RFC for Property Accessors Syntax
to bring that up to level of 7.x.
I’m not a C programmer so I’m interested in finding someone to co-write
this with. As for background I’m leading
On 5 July 2016 at 04:02, Pierre Joye wrote:
> We can argue about the provided pnrng being CS but it is not php's job to
> decide.
I think we need to drop the concerns about exposing "RNG state".
A reminder of what php_random_bytes looks at (in order):
* CryptGenRandom on Windows
* arc4random_buf
On 05/07/2016 14:21, Levi Morrison wrote:
if ($type instanceof ReflectionClassType) {
$r = $type->getClass();
}
The (currently) correct code would be:
if (class_exists($type->getName()) || interface_exists($type->getName())) {
$r = new ReflectionClass($type->getNam
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Björn Larsson
wrote:
> Den 2016-06-30 kl. 23:57, skrev Nikita Popov:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>>
>>> The RFC for improving ReflectionType[1] is now in voting phase. The
>>> voting
>>> window is June 30th through July 8th. I have
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-07-05 06:29:26+03:00
commit: 4b9362d
previous commit:c2b29a5
revision date: 2016-07-04 16:48:59+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
16 matches
Mail list logo
