Le 25/09/2015 21:10, j adams a écrit :
I have made good progress on a PHP extension and I'd like to post it on
github to get some review and help from some others. The folder has quite a
few files and I'm hoping to avoid putting anything in git that doesn't need
to be there.
I see that php 5.6 h
On 25 Sep 2015 21:10, "j adams" wrote:
>
> I have made good progress on a PHP extension and I'd like to post it on
> github to get some review and help from some others. The folder has quite
a
> few files and I'm hoping to avoid putting anything in git that doesn't
need
> to be there.
>
> I see th
Hi!
> I'm thinking primarily of the benefit to base or abstract classes. For
Both can have constructors.
> base classes which expect certain properties be set, they are exposed to
> the danger of remaining unset if the derived class overrides the
> constructor without calling the parent.
You s
I'm thinking primarily of the benefit to base or abstract classes. For
base classes which expect certain properties be set, they are exposed to
the danger of remaining unset if the derived class overrides the
constructor without calling the parent.
This solution is analogous to:
class Foo
{
Hi!
> ability to set default values of properties to instances of objects or
> calls to static methods or functions (expressions in general).
That is what constructors are for. I.e. I can understand initializing
static properties (though it gives a lot of potential for weird race
conditions) but
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Bob Weinand wrote:
> So, before I start the vote, just two quick notes:
> I've added two notes about the statement syntax and the single variable
> use.
> Though a few people complained, I'm not switching to the ==> operator, as
> I noticed many people expect
On 09/24/2015 03:43 PM, Dominic Grostate wrote:
Hi Ben & Internals,
I spent most of today and yesterday just getting used to the parser
language.
I was able to implement the basic syntax on most of the constructs, just to
get a partial proof of concept going.
https://github.com/orolyn/php-src/c
I have made good progress on a PHP extension and I'd like to post it on
github to get some review and help from some others. The folder has quite a
few files and I'm hoping to avoid putting anything in git that doesn't need
to be there.
I see that php 5.6 has this .gitignore file:
http://git.php.n
Hi,
I see what you mean with static properties, that would be more difficult.
I can answer on non-static however.
* When will $p2 be initialized, which properties can it access?
- On class instantiation. It won't have access to $this, because the
object won't have been created yet. It will hav
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:39 -0500, Sean DuBois wrote:
> C.) Has there ever been a conversation about improving extension building so
> that authors
> don't have to go out of their way to catch these things? I would really like
> to see phpize
> kick out a Makefile that in the process of build
Hi,
Would be good to split complete different subjects to different threads
anyways:
On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:53 +0100, Dominic Grostate wrote:
> the
> ability to set default values of properties to instances of objects or
> calls to static methods or functions (expressions in general).
This cau
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-09-25 05:12:40+03:00
commit: 5902af506a0bf44f5470835e6da66c47a7e0802e
revision_date: 2015-09-25 02:20:31+03:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping
2, LLC 45 MB
FYI the patch http://pastebin.com/wVymMAdZ , forwarding as seems my mail
filters put it into the internals folder while there was no internals in the
"to" list.
Regards
Anatol
-Original Message-
From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol@belski.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:4
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Weinand [mailto:bobw...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:00 AM
> To: PHP internals
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Short Closures
>
> Hey,
>
> Thanks for all your feedback in the discussion thread!
>
> So, before I start the vote
14 matches
Mail list logo
