Am 18.08.2015 um 19:07 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> Do you have some impregnable issue in mind preventing to do this?
Hm, maybe: what about the need for set_throwable_handler() that was
recently raised as a topic?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http:
Hi,
I've been contributing with language RFCs and bug fixes in the past. A
VCS account would be handy for the very obvious fixes.
Thanks!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 12/08/2015 11:31 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Christopher Jones mailto:christopher.jo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Bob,
Is the ext/phpdbg_webhelper sym link really needed ? If so, can you add it
to .gitignore.
Thank you,
Chris
--
http:/
Hi Matt,
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Wilmas [mailto:php_li...@realplain.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:40 AM
> To: Anatol Belski ; 'Jakub Zelenka'
> Cc: php-...@lists.php.net; 'PHP internals list'
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Fix possible overflow
Hi Anatol,
- Original Message -
From: "Anatol Belski"
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Ok, got the idea now. But sizeof(size_t) is always >
sizeof(zend_long). And for signed, still it is simpler and safer to
just use an #ifdef around.
No, == like I said. :-) OK, just saw your correcti
> -Original Message-
> From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol@belski.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:06 AM
> To: 'Matt Wilmas' ; 'Jakub Zelenka'
> Cc: php-...@lists.php.net; 'PHP internals list'
> Subject: [PHP-CVS] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Fix possible
> over
On 18.08.2015 at 22:47, Arne Blankerts wrote:
> while playing around with the new group use syntax, I stumbled upon an
> inconsistency of which I'm not sure whether or not it is expected.
> For the "classic" syntax, while technically pointless, a leading \ for
> the name is considered valid and wo
Hi Anatol,
- Original Message -
From: "Anatol Belski"
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Hi Matt,
> [...]
>
> The checks with zend_long vars like key_length and iterations are
> impossible
> when ZEND_LONG_MAX == INT_MAX (most if not all 32-bit, I guess). So
> those
> checks should alr
Hi,
2015-08-18 17:47 GMT-03:00 Arne Blankerts :
> Hi everyone,
>
> while playing around with the new group use syntax, I stumbled upon an
> inconsistency of which I'm not sure whether or not it is expected.
> For the "classic" syntax, while technically pointless, a leading \ for
> the name is cons
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Wilmas [mailto:php_li...@realplain.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:43 PM
> To: Jakub Zelenka
> Cc: Anatol Belski ; php-...@lists.php.net; PHP
> internals
> list
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Fix possible overflow in
> openssl
Hi Jakub,
- Original Message -
From: "Jakub Zelenka"
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Matt Wilmas
wrote:
Hi Anatol, Jakub,
[...]
The checks with zend_long vars like key_length and iterations are
impossible when ZEND_LONG_MAX == INT_MAX (most if not al
Hi
On 18 Aug 2015 22:21, "Anatol Belski" wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Wilmas [mailto:php_li...@realplain.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:48 PM
> > To: Jakub Zelenka ; Anatol Belski
> > Cc: php-...@lists.php.net; internals@lists.php.net
> > Subjec
Hi Matt,
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Wilmas [mailto:php_li...@realplain.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:48 PM
> To: Jakub Zelenka ; Anatol Belski
> Cc: php-...@lists.php.net; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Fix possible overflow in openssl_pbkd
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Matt Wilmas
wrote:
> Hi Anatol, Jakub,
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jakub Zelenka"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Anatol Belski
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Jakub
Hi Anatol, Jakub,
- Original Message -
From: "Jakub Zelenka"
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
Hi Jakub,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Zelenka [mailto:bu...@php.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 8:47 PM
> To: php-..
Hi everyone,
while playing around with the new group use syntax, I stumbled upon an
inconsistency of which I'm not sure whether or not it is expected.
For the "classic" syntax, while technically pointless, a leading \ for
the name is considered valid and works identical to a line without it:
si
Am 18.08.2015 um 19:07 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> Do you have some impregnable issue in mind preventing to do this?
No, I was just surprised. Must have missed the announcement.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Sebastian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:sebast...@php.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 6:44 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: bump versions: configure.in
> main/php_version.h
>
> Am 18.08.2015 um 16:06 schri
Am 18.08.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> Diff:
> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
> index 8907852..033c754 100644
> --- a/configure.in
> +++ b/configure.in
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int zend_sprintf(char *buffer, const char *format, ...);
> PHP_MAJOR_VERSION=7
> PHP_MINOR_VERSION=0
>
Please ignore the last email, and consider this one. Thank you!
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-08-18 11:06:04+03:00
commit: 17fc5cc65d3e7426516421f8bc950a97e1945f2f
revision_date:2015-08-18 08:20:12+02:00
environment: Haswell-EP
cpu: Intel(R) X
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-08-18 11:06:04+03:00
commit: 17fc5cc65d3e7426516421f8bc950a97e1945f2f
revision_date:2015-08-18 08:20:12+02:00
environment: Haswell-EP
cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2,
LLC 45 MB
21 matches
Mail list logo
