On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching out 7.0,
> tagging the first alpha or more likely beta) if we wanna keep up with
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline
>
I definitely think we should roll a packag
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Anthony Ferrara
wrote:
> All,
>
> I spent a little bit of time today trying to debug an issue with 7
> that Drupal 8 was facing, specifically regarding an array index not
> behaving correctly ($array["key"] returned null, even though the key
> existed in the hash
This is really interesting, but I think use of "ticks" for asynchronous
functions is bad approach.
A month or two ago I published a PoC for safe interrupt handling.
https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...dstogov:interrupt
Actually it's already partially committed to support timeout handl
Hi Dmitry,
On 7.04.2015 16:33, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Andrey,
I didn't get why do you need this extension and how it's going to be used.
I would like to implement (I have a PoC for this too), asynchronous
query handlers in mysqli@mysqlnd. Currently it is possible to have some
asynchronis
Hi Andrey,
I didn't get why do you need this extension and how it's going to be used.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to hear comments about a small change to the low-level tick
> functionality (main/php_ticks.c) to add state to when
Hi,
I would like to hear comments about a small change to the low-level tick
functionality (main/php_ticks.c) to add state to when calling a C tick
function
The patch is alive at : http://pastebin.com/0zhVNxaY
Currently a C tick function gets as a parameter just the number of
ticks, and can'
