[PHP-DEV] Native TLS

2014-10-29 Thread Matt Ficken
Anatol has been doing some great work with Thread Local Storage (under the native-tls branch). I have tested it on Windows and its performance and functionality are now the same as master builds (with phpng), though a few extensions included with Windows builds haven't been ported yet. Performanc

[PHP-DEV] Volunteering for sysadmin help

2014-10-29 Thread Chris Tankersley
I've heard through grapevine that PHP was looking for some extra help with some of the system administration tasks. I've been doing Linux administration for about 8 years, and currently run servers for developers that don't want to go through setting up their own servers. If there's any help that

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Readonly Properties

2014-10-29 Thread Andrea Faulds
> On 29 Oct 2014, at 04:29, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > Yup that's definitely better than having the readonly flag in the {} block as > I had it. > > I'd however say that it should be possible to define a writable property with > only a getter and then the setter would implicitly be created. Si

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-29 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Bob Weinand wrote: > > > Am 26.10.2014 um 16:09 schrieb Derick Rethans : > > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Joe Watkins wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 23:06 -0400, Derick Rethans wrote: > >>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Bob Weinand wrote: > > Log: > Made phpdbg co

[PHP-DEV] forbid use declaration outside of a namespace in PHP 7

2014-10-29 Thread Robert Stoll
Heya, I always found it very ugly that it is possible to define a use outside of a namespace. Consider the following: namespace{ //default namespace } use foo\Bar; namespace test{ new Bar(); //error, test\Bar not found } After some thoughts it is quite clear that Bar is test\Bar and not fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-29 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Bob Weinand wrote: > > Am 26.10.2014 um 16:22 schrieb Derick Rethans : > > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Joe Watkins wrote: > > > >> We will notify internals of our intentions to make such changes in > >> future, if we thought there was any chance of any feedback before > >> to

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-29 Thread Julien Pauli
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:10 AM, David Muir wrote: > > On 29/10/2014, at 12:43 AM, Julien Pauli wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:27 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: >>> On 2014-10-26, Bob Weinand wrote: > Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine : > > On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Wein

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-29 Thread Julien Pauli
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> phpdbg is under php.net ; every decision about phpdbg should then be >> debatted with all the team, and new ideas, such as a protocol, RFC'ed, >> whoever are the maintainers of the code. It's like that for every >> piece of code, of

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

2014-10-29 Thread David Muir
On 29/10/2014, at 12:43 AM, Julien Pauli wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:27 PM, David Soria Parra wrote: >> On 2014-10-26, Bob Weinand wrote: Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine : On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Weinand wrote: > Ask them at PhpStorm. They were pleased to