---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast!
Antivirus está activa.
http://www.avast.com
Am 10.09.2014 um 03:32 schrieb Andrea Faulds:
But then I’ve thought more about it. I’m usually OK with certain BC breaks, I
just don’t like this specific one. It doesn’t affect me, but, well, I don’t see
the point. It doesn’t really help language consistency or anything, (OK, sure,
only two se
Nikita Popov wrote:
> I've created a small RFC proposing the removal of the alternative PHP
> opening/closing tags:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_alternative_php_tags
>
> It removes <% and
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 10 Sep 2014, at 01:21, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > Isn’t this a bit of a needless BC break? Not very nice on people with
> such codebases. It’s also worth pointing out that people might be using
> these to get around the XML >
> > I’d v
On 10/09/2014 3:32, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Some further thoughts after discussing with Tyrael (Ferenc) on IRC.
I initially thought that I’m not really against removing them really, but I
think we should have a script to convert them first. Because someone,
somewhere, is gonna need it.
But then
On 11 September 2014 04:02:43 GMT+01:00, Park Framework
wrote:
>> You know, “int”, “float”, “string” etc. aren’t currently reserved
>words.
Well, they are in the context of casts:
$a = (int)'42';
$a = (string)42;
etc
> We could add functions, or even make them reserved words and add
>internal
Hi,
Please take a look and make your opinion.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fix_list_behavior_inconsistency
This inconsistency might be interpreted like a bug, but fixing it might
break existing PHP code (at least my attempt to fix it in documented way
broke few phpt tests).
Thanks. Dmitry.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/09/2014 09:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit : The big issue I see,
> is the news entry:
>
> . Fixed #65641 (PHP-FPM incorrectly defines the SCRIPT_NAME
> variable when using Apache). (David Zuelke)
Should p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> So what is the resolution for this? Should we roll back the fix,
> implement the new one and have one more RC, do something else?
>
Sorry, it seems I have miss your question :(
As David Zuelke
