> You know, “int”, “float”, “string” etc. aren’t currently reserved words. We
> could add functions, or even make them reserved words and add internal
> functions (à la isset), so int(‘2’), float(‘2.0’), string(‘test’) etc.
>
> Or perhaps class-like constructors? $a = new int('2'); ? Would kinda
Hi Matt,
On Wed, September 10, 2014 22:46, Matt Wilmas wrote:
> Hi Anatol, all,
>
>
> Sorry for top post... Stas must be getting confused with all these
> details! :-) Is Pierre going to weigh in? Are there any other Windows
> people?
>
> While I don't think I'd disagree with much of what you'v
On 10 Sep 2014, at 18:41, Rowan Collins wrote:
> I think this came up during the previous discussion, and I actually think it
> would be quite nice to have some functions both to perform a "strict"/"safe"
> cast (and raise E_CATCHABLE_ERROR or perhaps throw TypeCastException), and to
> check
On 05.09.2014, at 10:54, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 05/09/2014 15:52, David Zuelke a écrit :
>
>> People should simply use the SetHandler approach instead.
>
> I agree, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1136290
>
> But some people may want to use
The fix is not broken. He's describing a different/additional issue. Things
have always been shaky with ProxyPass (that's
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65641) because it's a bag of hurt. That's the
whole reason Apache now has SetHandler for proxies!
On 08.09.2014, at 22:54, Stas Malyshev wr
Hi Matt,
I do not think we should change anything in a stable branch now. We may
consider it for 5.6.1 once we are 200% sure we can back port it to 5.5.
Btw your patch is not windows only but also change the uuid function. Not a
bad thing as u never got why we have this modulo anyway :)
Cheers,
Hi Anatol, all,
Sorry for top post... Stas must be getting confused with all these details!
:-) Is Pierre going to weigh in? Are there any other Windows people?
While I don't think I'd disagree with much of what you've said, I don't see
that using my patch is *causing* or *creating* new is
Michael Wallner wrote (on 10/09/2014):
.oO(ext/filter) ?
Maybe I'm just missing some better documentation, but my main problems
with ext/filter are:
1) Many users don't know it exists, or how to use it.
2) It's pretty verbose and complex for such a simple task as "is this
thing a valid inte
On 10/09/14 19:41, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Andrea Faulds wrote (on 09/09/2014):
>> If people want strict casting, we can add new functions or operators
>> for that specifically.
>
> I think this came up during the previous discussion, and I actually
> think it would be quite nice to have some funct
Andrea Faulds wrote (on 09/09/2014):
If people want strict casting, we can add new functions or operators for that
specifically.
I think this came up during the previous discussion, and I actually
think it would be quite nice to have some functions both to perform a
"strict"/"safe" cast (and
On 09/07/14 22:00, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Having thought a bit about the subject, the heuristic I came up with was to
>> 1) do not run tests from the same extension in parallel, and 2) do not run
>> tests from certain extensions in parallel (e.g., mysql and pdo_mysql).
>
> How about ma
Hi Nikita
2014-09-10 0:08 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov :
> Hi internals!
>
> I've created a small RFC proposing the removal of the alternative PHP
> opening/closing tags:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_alternative_php_tags
Great RFC, +1. No need to defend these old nordic legacy features,
afai
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 8 September 2014 07:56, Christoph Becker wrote:
>> Am 08.09.2014 15:58, schrieb Andrea Faulds:
>>> We could add such an operator, perhaps with the ?? syntax. However, I
>>> don’t really like the idea. It’s too similar to ?: so I don’t think
On 10 September 2014 06:42, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I was fixing test cases on my `kill-ereg` branch I noticed a Reflection
> test case for `ReflectionFunction::isDeprecated()`.
>
> The problem with such a test case is that you’d be chasing deprecated
> functions to tests against as
On 10/09/2014 07:42, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
> void __deprecated__() { }
>
> And mark that function as eternally deprecated using the ZEND_ACC_DEPRECATED
> flag.
Is it really worth adding a new completely useless function just for a
test? It's not like functions are actually removed every day...
On 05/09/2014 17:38, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
> After discussing with Matteo, I realized I was referring to POSIX
> sempahores and not to System V.
>
> Patch looks ok to me.
>
> Is it possible to have this merged?
I've seen no objections raised, so I committed it to PHP-5.6 and master.
Hi Alex,
On 10 Sep 2014, at 13:59, Alexander Lisachenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Maybe it will be better to do this in another way: introduce an RFC to
> add 'deprecated' keyword into the syntax like 'final' or 'protected'.
> There are many frameworks that want to deprecate some methods or
> classes. C
17 matches
Mail list logo
