Hi!
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Florian Margaine
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a minor BC break, but still a BC break, so worth discussing on this
> ML.
>
> When a second setcookie() is done with the same name, a warning is emitted,
> because the ietf rfc 6265 says it *should* only send one Set-
On 7 Sep 2014, at 13:22, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
> I've played around with this branch for a bit and seems reasonable, passes
> the tests, and doesn't seem to have any serious issues/memories leaks
> AFAICT.
There’s actually a quite serious issue just now, which is that it evaluates the
first op
I've played around with this branch for a bit and seems reasonable, passes
the tests, and doesn't seem to have any serious issues/memories leaks
AFAICT.
I can't stress enough, however, how important it is for us to avoid
inconsistencies in behavior between various forms of syntax. This is often
so
Hi Andrea,
On Sep 6, 2014 2:03 AM, "Andrea Faulds" wrote:
>
> Good evening,
>
> I’ve written an RFC and working patch which attempt to add this feature
which has been often requested: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/isset_ternary
I did not look at the patch yet but I like it from a feature point of vie
