[PHP-DEV] Pull requests report (21/10/2013)

Hi, This week we've reached to PR #500 after 2 years of getting PRs officially. The more steady stream of PRs started in March 2012... so it's around a PR a day in average. New: #493 Honor cipher order #494 Verify

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Expectations

On 10/21/2013 09:16 AM, Michael Wallner wrote: On 21 October 2013 10:13, Patrick Schaaf wrote: Am 21.10.2013 03:52 schrieb "Joe Watkins" : So looks like we need a new name ?? Ideas ?? abstract EXPRESSION wat? abstract is already a keyword, so no BC. abstract is not concrete so alludes

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Expectations

On 21 October 2013 10:13, Patrick Schaaf wrote: > Am 21.10.2013 03:52 schrieb "Joe Watkins" : >> >> So looks like we need a new name ?? Ideas ?? > > abstract EXPRESSION wat? > abstract is already a keyword, so no BC. > > abstract is not concrete so alludes a bit to the > might-be-or-might-not-b

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Expectations

Am 21.10.2013 03:52 schrieb "Joe Watkins" : > > So looks like we need a new name ?? Ideas ?? abstract EXPRESSION abstract is already a keyword, so no BC. abstract is not concrete so alludes a bit to the might-be-or-might-not-be-checked nature of the test abstract is the name for the "short summ

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Expectations

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Wallner wrote: > On 21 October 2013 10:13, Patrick Schaaf wrote: > > Am 21.10.2013 03:52 schrieb "Joe Watkins" : > >> > >> So looks like we need a new name ?? Ideas ?? > > > > abstract EXPRESSION > > wat? > > > > abstract is already a keyword, so no BC. >

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Expectations

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Joe Watkins wrote: > On 10/20/2013 12:15 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Robert Stoll wrote: >> >> Heya, >>> >>> I do not know how much it concerns this RFC but I came across the >>> following >>> page about an extension named "Ex