Re: [PHP-DEV] __invokeStatic() method

2013-03-17 Thread Pierre du Plessis
On Mar 18, 2013 2:41 AM, "Thomas Bley" wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Pierre du Plessis > wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2013 9:35 PM, "Daniele Orlando" wrote: > >> > >> Hi List, > >> > >> I'm interested in proposing an RFC and I would know your opinion. > >> > >> === Current Situation === >

Re: [PHP-DEV] __invokeStatic() method

2013-03-17 Thread Thomas Bley
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Pierre du Plessis wrote: > On Mar 16, 2013 9:35 PM, "Daniele Orlando" wrote: >> >> Hi List, >> >> I'm interested in proposing an RFC and I would know your opinion. >> >> === Current Situation === >> Since PHP 5.3 we can use an object instance, who defines the __in

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4.13 RC1 and PHP 5.3.23 RC1

2013-03-17 Thread Martin Keckeis
Hello, no news entry on php.net? Best regards Martin 2013/3/1 Stas Malyshev > Hi! > > Due to the fixes to CVE-2013-1635 and CVE-2013-1643 we're releasing PHP > 5.4.13 RC1 and PHP 5.3.23 RC1 for testing a bit earlier. Both releases > can be found at: > http://downloads.php.net/stas/ > > Windows

Re: [PHP-DEV] Abstract properties

2013-03-17 Thread Clint Priest
Here here. :) On 3/17/2013 5:45 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: I'm also interested about the rationale behind this design decision. Just for the record, this would have been one of the things that the accessors proposal would have added. -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting on PHP features

2013-03-17 Thread Clint Priest
Unfortunately my experience with that process has been that many people will vote who had no part in the discussion. On 3/16/2013 3:16 PM, Sherif Ramadan wrote: On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Sébastien Durand wrote: Hi guys, *I think it could be a nice little improvement to add an extra f

Re: [PHP-DEV] Abstract properties

2013-03-17 Thread Nikita Popov
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > I'm also interested about the rationale behind this design decision. > Just for the record, this would have been one of the things that the accessors proposal would have added.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Abstract properties

2013-03-17 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
2012.12.01. 13:35, "Sebastian Krebs" ezt írta: > > Hi, > > Don't want to start a big discussion, but is there a concrete reason, why > abstract properties (or "a kind of abstract") are not supported? I've > learned, that "an interface [the concept, not the implementations within a > language] is t

[PHP-DEV] Re: Opcache tuning

2013-03-17 Thread Zeev Suraski
I missed the 'off' part... I guess it makes sense of we can do it. Sent from my mobile On 17 במרץ 2013, at 08:34, Dmitry Stogov wrote: Hi Zeev, Rasmus is talking about a case when O+ is loaded but completely disable for CLI. Of course, it makes no sense to load and parse blacklist file in thi