Hi,
I wanted just remind about that bug and the patches hanging there. If
there are no objections, I'd commit first to 5.5+ next week. 5.3/5.4 were
also debatable.
Regards
Anatol
On Tue, March 5, 2013 12:46, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Sorry, the correct one is bug #53437 ...
>
>
> On Tue, March 5,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Christopher Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/02/2013 09:42 AM, Christopher Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/13 3:19 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote:
Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a
On 03/02/2013 09:42 AM, Christopher Jones wrote:
On 3/2/13 3:19 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote:
Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net
project so it makes little sense to have it listed there.
On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, "Te
On 06.03.13 13:48, Max Romanovsky wrote:
>4. Add handling of DateTime objects to SoapServer and SoapClient. It
>will help in using this build-in datatype without typemap.
This is (at least partially) covered by the patch in
https://bugs.php.net/44383. Have you tried that one to see if its
Christopher Jones in php.internals (Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:42:30 -0800):
>Bugs can (and have been) reported via
>https://github.com/zend-dev/ZendOptimizerPlus/issues
Just to draw the attention on the list:
https://github.com/zend-dev/ZendOptimizerPlus/issues/57
O+ is not stable yet, it does not eve
> I'm right now oblivious to what is being voted or not in this case,
> but ignoring a defined 2/3 rule is clearly wrong. Either remove rules or
> follow them otherwise they become useless noise.
As far as I understand the RFC is a process to accept or reject features.
The question that falls
I ran some benchs, on my current machine (wasnt isolated to run tests). I
ran micro_bench.php on master branch today :
debug on, inline enabled :
Total 30.688
debug on, inline disabled :
Total 35.377
debug off, inline enabled :
Total 10.130
debug off, inline
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hey:
>
>I propose to disable zend_alwasy_inline while build PHP in debug mode.
>
>that could be easier for debuging some bugs..
>
>what do you think?
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>simple patch:
>
> diff --git a/Zend/zend.h b/Zend/zend.h
> inde
Hey:
I propose to disable zend_alwasy_inline while build PHP in debug mode.
that could be easier for debuging some bugs..
what do you think?
thanks
simple patch:
diff --git a/Zend/zend.h b/Zend/zend.h
index 40515fb..03bd4e7 100644
--- a/Zend/zend.h
+++ b/Zend/zend.h
@@ -365,7 +3
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Dohms [mailto:lis...@rafaeldohms.com.br]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:52 PM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: Anthony Ferrara; Philip Olson; David Soria Parra; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP
> distributio
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> The 62.8% comparison to 60.7% is the most out of touch thing I've read on
> this mailing list in a long time. If you're talking about pure feature
> yay/nay then 94% have given a yay to this "feature". The split is the
> timing.
>
>
Sorry, b
> > > When do you upgrade to a new release of php e.g. 5.3 -> 5.4
> > > - As soon as released
> > > - wait for the x.1 release
> > > - Once our OpCode cache supports it
> > > - When previous version hits EOL
> > > - When a new feature warrants the upgrade
> > > - When my Framework (Zend
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:00 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on
> wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/
> and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient.
I disagree that it is the only point requiring 2/3, bu
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> The 62.8% comparison to 60.7% is the most out of touch thing I've read on
> this mailing list in a long time. If you're talking about pure feature
> yay/nay then 94% have given a yay to this "feature". The split is the
> timing.
Right, the sp
14 matches
Mail list logo