Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

On 03/02/2013 11:25 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: >>> How "Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP" can be remotely related to the >>> available of o+ via PECL? >> >> Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched >> to the activ

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> How "Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP" can be remotely related to the >> available of o+ via PECL? > > Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched > to the active vote, but it used to read 'Don't integrate Optim

RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

> How "Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP" can be remotely related to the > available of o+ via PECL? Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched to the active vote, but it used to read 'Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP, release only in PECL'. My bad. Zeev -- PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

hi Zeev, On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > ok, given the total lack of answers, mistakes and misleading wording > > in the RFC and lack of releases in PECL (which is a pre requise since > > quite some time to get in core), I'd to vote -1 for now. > > +1, > > there should be

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

ok, given the total lack of answers, mistakes and misleading wording in the RFC and lack of releases in PECL (which is a pre requise since quite some time to get in core), I'd to vote -1 for now. +1, there should be a option "release at PECL", which will give the O+ more feedback and test Th

[PHP-DEV] SPKAC (FR #38917, pull 267)

Hi! I've reviewed the pull 267 and it seems to be finally ready, at least I can't see any problem with it. Is 5.5 still open for adding self-contained functions or should it remain in master? Thanks, -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext.

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> Based on the overwhelming response, the vote is now open J >> >> >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus >> >> >> >> Voting ends March 7th. > > ok, given the total lack of answers, m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: VCS Account Request: ardbiesheuvel

On 3 March 2013 07:48, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:18 AM, PHP Group wrote: >> rasmus approved ardbiesheuvel account request \o/ >> > > Are you a different guy from abies (with an @ewi.tudelft.nl address)? > Credited as the author of Firebird/InterBase driver for PDO & Inte

Re: [PHP-DEV] Optimizer+ bugreps

On 02/03/13 17:42, Christopher Jones wrote: I realize that this is a bit of a catch-22, but surely it would be better to allow properly tracked open bug reporting sooner rather later? Bugs can (and have been) reported via https://github.com/zend-dev/ZendOptimizerPlus/issues I'm

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: VCS Account Request: ardbiesheuvel

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:18 AM, PHP Group wrote: > rasmus approved ardbiesheuvel account request \o/ > Are you a different guy from abies (with an @ewi.tudelft.nl address)? Credited as the author of Firebird/InterBase driver for PDO & Interbase... The abies account is still active.. -Hannes -

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution

On 2013-02-27, Zeev Suraski wrote: > On 27 2013, at 18:58, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > >> Zeev et al, >> >> I just want to put my justification for the "only if no delay" vote. I voted >> that way because we're already at a significant delay. If this vote was a >> month ago when O+ was sugges

[PHP-DEV] Re: VCS Account Request: dlsniper

VCS Account Approved: dlsniper approved by rasmus \o/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] VCS Account Request: dlsniper

I want to help out with bug handling (as Rasmus indicated on IRC) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Optimizer+ bugreps

On 3/2/13 3:19 AM, Terry Ellison wrote: On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote: Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net project so it makes little sense to have it listed there. On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, "Terry Ellison" mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk>> wrote:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Optimizer+ bugreps

On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote: Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net project so it makes little sense to have it listed there. On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, "Terry Ellison" > wrote: At what point is O+ reporting going

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP Wiki] new user: fabpot

Maybe the time has come for the adoption of some actual bylaws which succintly state who merits voting privileges and who may propose an RFC. If one reads 2.II.a of https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto, that document indicates that the ability to propose an RFC does not automatically confer one with

Re: [PHP-DEV] Optimizer+ bugreps

Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net project so it makes little sense to have it listed there. On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, "Terry Ellison" wrote: > At what point is O+ reporting going to be possible through > https://bugs.php.net/ ? > > I realize that this is a

[PHP-DEV] Optimizer+ bugreps

At what point is O+ reporting going to be possible through https://bugs.php.net/ ? I realize that this is a bit of a catch-22, but surely it would be better to allow properly tracked open bug reporting sooner rather later? Regards Terry

Re: [PHP-DEV] O+ support for PHP 5.x (Was current Status of O+ on Windows)

On 02/03/13 08:39, Zeev Suraski wrote: The current vote that's going on right now deals with putting the extension into PHP itself. If that happens (which seems awfully likely at this point), why do we need it in PECL? My response to your Q is that there is probably going to be quite a lot of i

[PHP-DEV] 回复： [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows

+1 s, Switch to a new opcode cacher is much easier than update PHP, and ZO+ is already compatible with <5.5. we could use ZO+ as soon as possible. -- reeze | reeze.cn 已使用 Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) 在 2013年3月2日星期六，下午4:43，Ferenc Kovacs 写道： > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM > > To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov > > Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP

RE: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM > To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov > Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows > > > > Did you experiment w

Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows

> > Did you experiment with any options? > > Putting the date of your O+ snapshot would also be handy. > > Latest from here are used: > http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/Optimizer/7.0.0-dev/ > > Dates are included. It would be nice to have it in the report as well, > but we always use lat

[PHP-DEV] Re: voting without vcs accounts

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I sent an email last year about this issue, but it got sidetracked (partly > it was my fault): > http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54267.html > So this time, I would like focusing only on the following: > >1