On 02/07/2013 10:25 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Rosse wrote:
>
>> why wouldn't this go into core? setting the name of the current
>> php-process is definitely something everyone that develops php-cli scripts
>> could use.
>>
> I use a lot of php-cli scripts
Addressing a bunch of comments at once:
1) I've removed is_available and renamed the set/get methods to:
cli_process_title_set/get. I've also removed the test dependencies on pcntl
and posix. The patch is updated: https://gist.github.com/keyurdg/4728770
2) Updated the RFC's introduction section wit
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Rosse wrote:
> why wouldn't this go into core? setting the name of the current
> php-process is definitely something everyone that develops php-cli scripts
> could use.
>
I use a lot of php-cli scripts and I've never seen the need. Without having
hard data
I have a confirmed bug with Intel Engineering. For clarification
purposes here, it only happens on 64-bit bit versions of icc and
possibly only on Linux. If you link against the math library using
`-lm` then this goes away at the cost of performance (though a
negligible cost I would guess).
Thanks
Am 2013-02-07 14:57, schrieb Christoph Rosse:
Am 2013-02-07 14:00, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that
the number of people w
Hello internals.
I'm actually using proctitle extension and it's very handy because we run
like 10+ daemons written in PHP that we manage. Without it we would be lost
:) But the actual awareness of the proctitle PECL extension is very low.
Also it does not work on windows.
I'm all over the idea to
Am 2013-02-07 14:00, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that the number
of people who require (and would use) this functionality
Am 2013-02-07 13:33, schrieb Leigh:
On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
want
to take a look at that.
http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
Did you read RFC?
Keyu
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Harald Lapp wrote:
> Am 07.02.13 11:40, schrieb Michael Wallner:
>
>>> great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
>>> updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
>>> wanted to give it a try, but there seems to
On 07.02.2013, at 16:33, Leigh wrote:
> Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
> improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that the
> number of people who require (and would use) this functionality is very very
> small indeed.
well, 2 reaso
On 7 February 2013 13:33, Leigh wrote:
> On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
>>
>> > There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
>> want
>> > to take a look at that.
>> >
>> > http://pecl.php.net/package/proc
On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
> On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
>
> > There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
> want
> > to take a look at that.
> >
> > http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
>
> Did you read RFC?
> Keyur mentions it and
On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh wrote:
> There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may want
> to take a look at that.
>
> http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
Did you read RFC?
Keyur mentions it and its limitations there
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
https://github.com/indey
Am 07.02.13 11:40, schrieb Michael Wallner:
great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
wanted to give it a try, but there seems to be a problem with the uploaded
package: it seems to only contain t
> great, that someone is updating this extension. will you also offer an
> updated version for php-5.5 later (if it does not already work)? i just
> wanted to give it a try, but there seems to be a problem with the uploaded
> package: it seems to only contain the "package.xml"?
% tar -i
--
Rega
Am 06.02.13 14:14, schrieb Gabriel Wu:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I think mentioning Sara as a sponsor would weight in more than myself. ;)
Oh, you aren't the one approving the application?
Anyway I was wondering how to go about submitting the update - are
there
There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may want
to take a look at that.
http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
On 7 February 2013 05:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
> on Linux. It is bas
On 7 February 2013 09:37, Christoph Rosse wrote:
> Am 2013-02-07 08:45, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
>
>>
>> On 07.02.2013, at 9:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process'
>>> title
>>> on Linux. It is based off of the Postgre
Am 2013-02-07 08:45, schrieb Alexey Zakhlestin:
On 07.02.2013, at 9:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
Hello,
I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
on Linux. It is based off of the PostgreSQL implementation and is more
robust than the proctitle extension.
More det
Hi Keyur,
On 07/02/13 06:40, Keyur Govande wrote:
Hello,
I've created a new RFC to improve support for setting a CLI process' title
on Linux. It is based off of the PostgreSQL implementation and is more
robust than the proctitle extension.
More details and patch here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc
20 matches
Mail list logo
