Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP-5.5 unpack change broke pecl/pear

2013-01-13 Thread Remi Collet
Le 14/01/2013 06:57, Sherif Ramadan a écrit : > Please let me know if there are other BC concerns that have not yet come up. Please don't forget that php tree comes with pear/install-pear-nozlib.phar This old archive contains Archive_Tar 1.3.7, so should be updated. (I don't know who st

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP-5.5 unpack change broke pecl/pear

2013-01-13 Thread Sherif Ramadan
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Christopher Jones < christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 12/28/2012 01:08 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > >> Le 24/12/2012 04:16, Igor Wiedler a écrit : >> >>> Hi Internals, >>> >>> When test driving PHP-5.5 I ran into issues with a change of unpack >>> behaviou

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP-5.5 unpack change broke pecl/pear

2013-01-13 Thread Christopher Jones
On 12/28/2012 01:08 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 24/12/2012 04:16, Igor Wiedler a écrit : Hi Internals, When test driving PHP-5.5 I ran into issues with a change of unpack behaviour. Archive_Tar which is used by pecl and pear (`pecl install`) uses unpack with the "a" format character. On 5.4 i

[PHP-DEV] FW: Functionality request/proposal

2013-01-13 Thread Paulo Henrique Torrens
Hi, I'm currently interested in two features I'd like to see in PHP; how do I proceed to request/propose them? I'd be glad to help implementing them as well, if necessary. One of them is really simple, but would be helpful to people with different coding styles class Test { public function

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-RFC] Property Accessors 1.2 : parent::$foo Issue

2013-01-13 Thread Clint Priest
On 1/13/2013 8:01 AM, Mark wrote: I'm guessing this RFC won't make it in PHP 5.5? Too bad since it did seem like a very nice feature to have. I don't know if it is very helpful but posting nevertheless. I'm a C++/Qt/QML/PHP developer and for me the proposed syntax in the v1.2 document makes per

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-RFC] Property Accessors 1.2 : parent::$foo Issue

2013-01-13 Thread Mark
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Re the ReflectionProperty::getParentProperty($this, 'foo') suggestion, >> is this supposed to already get the value of the property (and there >> would be an additional method ReflectionProperty::setParentProperty)? > > I meant getti