Hi internals!
The ::class resolution proposal had significant discussion in April and
I've updated the patch to address issues that came up then. At this
point, I've gotten some positive feedback from various places and feel
its time to open it up for a vote to internals.
RFC: https://w
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
internals@lists.php.net mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at internals-ow...@lists.php.net.
To confirm that you would like
arch...@mail-archive.com
added to the internals mailing list, please send
an empty reply to this
Hannes,
> First off, this has been discussed on the list for literally months. Why
> > wait until the day before voting can end before bringing this up?
>
> So commenting is strictly forbidden during votes?
Not in the least. Just pointing out that this discussion could have been
better if it wa
hi,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> It's not the end of the world, because we can copy/paste that function into
> the PECL extension, and just conditionally include it. There would be
> duplication between the two, but it wouldn't be too bad...
agreed.
> Consider? Sur
Pierre,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Stas,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
> > OTOH, PECL module that can be built in 5.3/5.4 too might be nice. Not
> > everybody is going to upgrade to 5.5 soon, so having them participate
> > would be go
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> We do not have this clue in master and there are for sure non
>>> acceptable BC breaks in master. They won't be in 5.5. I'd said before,
>>
>> Why don't we have a clue? We def
