On 16.08.2012, at 0:18, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> How come there is no straight-foward obvious way to simply remove a given
> value from an array?
Well, this sounds like a reason for creating SplSet class
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Lars Schultz wrote:
> Am 16.08.2012 07:55, schrieb Sherif Ramadan:
>
>> Now your array is something completely different from what you wanted.
>> The solution stated earlier is the most sane one (just using
>> array_keys() with a search value).
>
>
> the array_keys
Hi:
This feature introduces list() support in foreach constructs(more
info can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist).
this could make the grammar more consistent, see following example:
previous discussion could be found at :
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=134277
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
> it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
> ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with t
On 17/08/12 23:41, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
> implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
> operators the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction
> with the assignment like the other binary
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> Most other languages have more than one collection-type... since PHP has
> only the single, hybrid array-type which acts both as a hash and as an
> array, something like this ought to be available.
>
> I don't know why everyone is so eager
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators
the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the
assignment like the other binary operators. Don't know, if anybody
understands me
On 08/17/2012 05:35 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> Most other languages have more than one collection-type... since PHP has
> only the single, hybrid array-type which acts both as a hash and as an
> array, something like this ought to be available.
>
> I don't know why everyone is so eager to jump up
Most other languages have more than one collection-type... since PHP has
only the single, hybrid array-type which acts both as a hash and as an
array, something like this ought to be available.
I don't know why everyone is so eager to jump up and argue against
something this simple, basic and usef
On 08/17/2012 05:21 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>>
>> if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
>> unset($messages[$key]);
>> }
>>
>> Nothing horrible here.
>>
>
> I disagree - this is (or should be) a simple, atomic operation...
> yet, you've got a function-call, an intermediar
>
> if(($key = array_search($del_val, $messages)) !== false) {
> unset($messages[$key]);
> }
>
> Nothing horrible here.
>
I disagree - this is (or should be) a simple, atomic operation...
yet, you've got a function-call, an intermediary variable, a boolean test,
and an unset statement repeatin
On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Kris Craig
mailto:kris.cr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Anthony Ferrara
mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com>>wrote:
Stan,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Stan Vass
mailto:sv_for...@fmethod.com>>
Hi all,
I'm wondering what the status/plan is for supporting PGP for Phar signatures.
So far I've only found a couple of vague references such as on the
Phar::setSignatureAlgorithm() manual page:
> The signature algorithm must be one of Phar::MD5, Phar::SHA1, Phar::SHA256,
> Phar::SHA512, or Ph
13 matches
Mail list logo
