On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
>> What exactly valid points? == is a converting operator, === is a
>> strict
>> operator. OK, in his favorite language it is not. Where exactly the
>> valid point is? Author goes at great lengths to refuse to make even a
>> slight mental effor
Hi,
2012/5/6 Richard Lynch :
> On Wed, April 11, 2012 5:14 pm, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>> I think my RFC confused people on this list due to improper
>> descriptions
>> and too much information. Sorry for the confusion. I revised the RFC
>> so
>> that most important points can be understood at a glanc
Hi!
> However, is there a predictable process for picking some requests over others?
Yes. Creating and RFC and discussing it on the list raises chance of
resolution (one way or another) of the request.
For smaller feature that does not warrant RFC, pull request on github
and note on internals wou
On 05/06/2012 08:23 AM, Dmitri Dmitrison wrote:
> That is actually a promising statistic.
>
> However, is there a predictable process for picking some requests over others?
> If it's based on whether it resonated with the PHP dev who happened to
> look at it, why even have a voting feature (and su
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> We don't have the resources to go through and thoroughly evaluate each
> feature request. A couple of developers will read each one and if it
> resonates with them personally they will do something about it.
> Otherwise they leave it for a
Just a quick reply from my phone:
anybody can register a wiki account and anybody can get rfc karma after
sending a mail to the php-webmaster mailing list (this is a basic spam
protection).
about the rfc vs bug tracker: the wiki and the rfc process came later than
the bugtracker.
I would open a fea
On 05/06/2012 07:28 AM, Dmitri Dmitrison wrote:
> So that just makes me wonder.
> Is anyone even checking the bug system for requests anymore?
> If the team feels strongly not to implement certain features, could you
> just reply to those tickets and close them?
> Would it be better to create RFCs
Hi all,
First time poster here... Just hoping to get some information.
It says on bugs.php.net that the best way to 'support' a request, is to
vote on it.
However, the most voted feature requests rarely get so much as a reply from
a PHP developer, let alone an implementation.
I'm not being critic
Hi Laruence,
the solution you suggest would work though it makes it all a bit more
verbose...
I noticed also that the original variable is completely removed from the
function scope, which is probably a bug.
I'll raise a ticket, thank you ;-)
Devis
On 6 May 2012 05:04, Laruence wrote:
> On S
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> after a deep look, I think it's not a bug.
>
> the exception in the catch block is only a local var of that block.
Not sure this makes sense to me. PHP does not have block scopes; all
variables in a function are in the same scope. For ex
Hi
Thanks for the replies to this thread - I'll get on with it then :-)
Zoe
It's very important! Take a look at http://gcov.php.net
A single build takes almost 2 days with most extensions enabled plus
valgrind testing.
So, yes, parallel testing would be highly appreciated (but do not
forget
11 matches
Mail list logo
