I've been owned :(
2012/4/2 Charlie Somerville
> April fools
>
> On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 4:41 PM, Eloy Bote Falcon wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> Maybe this is not the correct list to ask this, but why is the perl logo
> placed in the php website, instead of the php logo?
>
>
>
April fools
On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 4:41 PM, Eloy Bote Falcon wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Maybe this is not the correct list to ask this, but why is the perl logo
> placed in the php website, instead of the php logo?
>
>
Hi internals,
Maybe this is not the correct list to ask this, but why is the perl logo
placed in the php website, instead of the php logo?
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Florian Anderiasch
> wrote:
>
> > due to the widespread acceptance of binary number format (0b1010101) and
> > the growing demand for backwards compatibility I've started to work on
> > support for Roman
hi,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
> due to the widespread acceptance of binary number format (0b1010101) and
> the growing demand for backwards compatibility I've started to work on
> support for Roman Numerals (I, II, III, ...)
I am really really not sure we want th
On 2012-04-01, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
> Hey there,
> due to the widespread acceptance of binary number format (0b1010101) and
> the growing demand for backwards compatibility I've started to work on
> support for Roman Numerals (I, II, III, ...)
>
> As you might know, this format cannot be stri
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Daniel Convissor <
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:33:59AM -0700, Christopher Jones wrote:
> >
> > In that case, perhaps the STD_PHP_INI_* values should match those
> > in php.ini-development?
>
> Many sites have v
Hi Folks:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:33:59AM -0700, Christopher Jones wrote:
>
> In that case, perhaps the STD_PHP_INI_* values should match those
> in php.ini-development?
Many sites have very small ini files and rely on the default ini values
for everything else. This means changing the defau
Hi Folks:
This topic appears to have been quietly tabled. I didn't notice a
decision here or a commit.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:12:03PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> So maybe a way to tackle this is to use the
> mbstring internal encoding when it is set as the htmlspecialchars
> default wh
>
>
> The one problem I see here is that we keep only 100 last builds, so if bug
> is old enough you can't know build/revision where it's introduced.
> Maybe we should not keep in jenkins build php binary but only lightweight
> stuff like junit logs, coverage reports (if we have them) and etc. This
1 апреля 2012 г. 14:27 пользователь Ferenc Kovacs
>
написал:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christopher Jones <
> christopher.jo...@oracle.com > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/31/12 2:38 PM, Alexey Shein wrote:
>>
>>> 1 апреля 2012 г. 0:27 пользователь Johannes Schlüter
>>> > написал:
>>>
On Sat,
On 01/04/12 14:19, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
> I'd appreciate any hints on how to tackle this serious concern.
You should launch a new thread to tackle them. You could then buy
foreign slaves to schedule them on their cores.
> Btw, in the spirit of x for hex and b for binary I thought about using
> Though does it count if it's still March 31st over here? ;)
>
> --Kris
Nope, you've been caught! (=
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1 апреля 2012 г. 2:38 пользователь Alexey Shein написал:
> 1 апреля 2012 г. 0:27 пользователь Johannes Schlüter
> написал:
>> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:21 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
>>> By constantly publishing
>>> newsletter with failed / xfail bugs you're telling them "That's our
>>> current pro
Hey there,
due to the widespread acceptance of binary number format (0b1010101) and
the growing demand for backwards compatibility I've started to work on
support for Roman Numerals (I, II, III, ...)
As you might know, this format cannot be strictly parsed from left to
right or right to left, as s
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The removal of sqlite in PHP 5.4 has not been thoroughly thought through.
>
> In the documentation it says it has been moved to PECL.
> Then you go to PECL and the only thing you find is the version from 2004,
> which states that
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christopher Jones <
christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/31/12 2:38 PM, Alexey Shein wrote:
>
>> 1 апреля 2012 г. 0:27 пользователь Johannes Schlüter
>> написал:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:21 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
>>>
By constantly publis
On 01.04.12 4:02 , Christopher Jones wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for: http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/sqlite/trunk/
> ?
Yes, thank you.
> This was undoubtedly omitted due to lack of resources. Would you like some
> assistance to show you how you can contribute to the PHP project to help
On 01.04.12 4:01 , Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Moved to pecl implies it is in the pecl repository:
Ok, it would have been nice, if this had been mentioned in the documentation,
maybe with a link.
> svn checkout https://svn.php.net/repository/pecl/sqlite/trunk sqlite
> cd sqlite
> phpize
> ./configure
Hello,
The removal of sqlite in PHP 5.4 has not been thoroughly thought through.
In the documentation it says it has been moved to PECL.
Then you go to PECL and the only thing you find is the version from 2004,
which states that this package is not maintained and furthermore you find a
link to th
On 4/1/12 12:47 AM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
Hello,
The removal of sqlite in PHP 5.4 has not been thoroughly thought through.
In the documentation it says it has been moved to PECL.
Then you go to PECL and the only thing you find is the version from 2004,
which states that this package is not m
On 04/01/2012 12:47 AM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The removal of sqlite in PHP 5.4 has not been thoroughly thought through.
>
> In the documentation it says it has been moved to PECL.
> Then you go to PECL and the only thing you find is the version from 2004,
> which states that this pa
On 3/31/12 2:38 PM, Alexey Shein wrote:
1 апреля 2012 г. 0:27 пользователь Johannes Schlüter
написал:
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:21 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
By constantly publishing
newsletter with failed / xfail bugs you're telling them "That's our
current problems. Maybe you could help us
23 matches
Mail list logo
