On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> -_#...
> Nice play ,Moriyoshi sama!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> 在 2012-4-1，11:03，Rasmus Lerdorf 写道：
>
> > On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction.
>
> >
-_#...
Nice play ,Moriyoshi sama!
Sent from my iPhone
在 2012-4-1，11:03，Rasmus Lerdorf 写道：
> On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction.
>>>
>>>
>
> No problem. Keeping the April 1st RFCs factually accurate i
Am 01.04.2012 03:59, schrieb Moriyoshi Koizumi:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a RFC that proposes removal of PHP tags. There is actually
> strong public demand for it, and I also think it is necessary to
> leverage PHP to a genuine, modern scripting language.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/nophptags
nice 1s
Well played Moriyoshi. Well played.
Brian.
http://brian.moonspot.net
On 3/31/12 10:02 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction.
No problem. Keeping the April 1st RFCs factually accurate is
On Mar 31, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
No problem. Keeping the April 1st RFCs factually accurate is a top priority
around here.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubs
Ok, I'll try to fix that part. Thanks for the correction.
Moriyoshi
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote a RFC that proposes removal of PHP tags. There is actually
>> strong public demand for it, a
Hi:
sorry for say that, but the only benifit I can see, is save 5+ characters...
thanks
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Klaus Silveira wrote:
> What many people fail to see is that PHP is it's own templating language.
> It might be ugly for people used to other template languages, but it wor
What many people fail to see is that PHP is it's own templating language.
It might be ugly for people used to other template languages, but it works
perfectly and right out of the box.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Klaus Silveira wrote:
> Removing PHP's native feature of being able to be easi
On Mar 31, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a RFC that proposes removal of PHP tags. There is actually
> strong public demand for it, and I also think it is necessary to
> leverage PHP to a genuine, modern scripting language.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/nophptags
I
Removing PHP's native feature of being able to be easily embedded inside
HTML and other markup languages is absolutely retrograde. Of of the biggest
points in favor of PHP is that i'm able to easily do this:
Or this:
Without having to implement any slow-as-hell template language. It
Hi,
I wrote a RFC that proposes removal of PHP tags. There is actually
strong public demand for it, and I also think it is necessary to
leverage PHP to a genuine, modern scripting language.
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/nophptags
Regards,
Moriyoshi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2012/4/1 David Soria Parra :
> > On 2012-03-31, Thomas Hruska wrote:
> >> I've been writing software for Windows in Visual Studio since forever
> >> and also know user-land PHP like the back of my hand and, even after a
> >> few Googl
1 апреля 2012 г. 0:27 пользователь Johannes Schlüter
написал:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:21 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> By constantly publishing
>> newsletter with failed / xfail bugs you're telling them "That's our
>> current problems. Maybe you could help us with them". This way we
>> could co
Hi
2012/4/1 David Soria Parra :
> On 2012-03-31, Thomas Hruska wrote:
>> I've been writing software for Windows in Visual Studio since forever
>> and also know user-land PHP like the back of my hand and, even after a
>> few Google searches, I'm still scratching my head over which PHP Windows
>> b
Hi!
> btw, I, for one, am not BLIND. Thanks.
Coincidentally, just read this:
http://thingist.com/t/item/4372/
I think makes a useful reading.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:21 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
> By constantly publishing
> newsletter with failed / xfail bugs you're telling them "That's our
> current problems. Maybe you could help us with them". This way we
> could convert that discussing energy into some good patches.
While many peop
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:27 +0500, Alexey Shein wrote:
> Ok, we have a weekly reminder to bug maintainers (that maybe not
> working).
Those are working. At least for me :-)
There was some trouble with mails for individual changes, but recently I
got an "you have been assigned" mail, too.
> That'
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:16 -0700, Christopher Jones wrote:
> The XFAIL mechanism reflects the reality of open source that not all
> bugs are fixed.
I wonder what that has to do with open source ... besides maybe TeX
there's no non-trivial bug free software.
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
> Fixing the Windows binary download page so that it is USABLE by the average
> user should be priority #1.
> Here are the specific issues with the Windows binary download page:
>
> * The "Which version do I choose?" box is confusing, o
On 2012-03-31, Thomas Hruska wrote:
> I've been writing software for Windows in Visual Studio since forever
> and also know user-land PHP like the back of my hand and, even after a
> few Google searches, I'm still scratching my head over which PHP Windows
> binary download I want to use. If *I
I've been writing software for Windows in Visual Studio since forever
and also know user-land PHP like the back of my hand and, even after a
few Google searches, I'm still scratching my head over which PHP Windows
binary download I want to use. If *I* can't figure out which version is
appropri
On 03/31/2012 01:52 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> On 2012-03-31, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> Commit:3bf53aa911e1e2128a11aee45c126000635de006
>> Author:David Soria Parra Sat, 31 Mar 2012
>> 09:34:25 +0200
>> Parents: aa774a51d5c45b98103e0f67914d4c0b152e80ae
>> ff8be9845f14a815
31 марта 2012 г. 18:19 пользователь Clint M Priest
написал:
> The patches are applied to this fork if anyone wants to check it out:
>
> https://github.com/cpriest/php-src
>
It would be easier to discuss/review your patch if you'd make pull
request: https://wiki.php.net/vcs/gitworkflow#workflow_fo
The patches are applied to this fork if anyone wants to check it out:
https://github.com/cpriest/php-src
-Original Message-
From: Clint M Priest [mailto:cpri...@zerocue.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:14 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] (*PATCH*) getters/sette
hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> +1 for monthly.
>
It is the case already and I get them regularly.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http:
2012/3/31 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
>> That's not true. There is a weekly reminder email if you have
>> outstanding open bugs assigned to you. Although I haven't seen one for a
>> little while, so we may finally have given up on that since it was
>> completely ineffective.
>
> Actually, this one I'd
On 2012-03-31, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Commit:3bf53aa911e1e2128a11aee45c126000635de006
> Author:David Soria Parra Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:34:25
> +0200
> Parents: aa774a51d5c45b98103e0f67914d4c0b152e80ae
> ff8be9845f14a8156e7551033c2e98dad459f6fd
> Branches: PHP-5.4 master
>
>
在 2012年3月31日星期六，下午4:35，Stas Malyshev 写道：
> Hi!
>
> > If is set to false does it means the first parameter can't be string?
>
> It can. But it won't be seen as a class name, but rather as a string,
> that is not an object that is an instance of a subclass of anything, so
> it will return false.
On 03/31/2012 01:21 AM, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 31 марта 2012 г. 12:50 пользователь Stas Malyshev
> написал:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> 2) Keep devs' attention on known failures - XFAIL doesn't solve that.
>>> You remember about them when you run tests and if you want make
>>> attention at them.
>>
>> Which devs
Hi!
> If is set to false does it means the first parameter can't be string?
It can. But it won't be seen as a class name, but rather as a string,
that is not an object that is an instance of a subclass of anything, so
it will return false.
> Can't we just make the last parameter to autoload=true
Hi,
This is my suggestion for is_subclass_of() doc fix.
I've already committed. If anyone want to improve, please do.
https://gist.github.com/2260846
I would like to allow string class name always and only
prevent autoloading, but I don't care much.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
31 марта 2012 г. 12:34 пользователь Rasmus Lerdorf написал:
> On 03/30/2012 11:25 PM, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> Hmm, that's different. You get a notification if there's some change
>> on that bug (new comment/state changed/patch etc.). If bug didn't
>> change for years, you won't get any notification
31 марта 2012 г. 12:50 пользователь Stas Malyshev
написал:
> Hi!
>
>> 2) Keep devs' attention on known failures - XFAIL doesn't solve that.
>> You remember about them when you run tests and if you want make
>> attention at them.
>
> Which devs you are referring to? Why you assume their attention n
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Adam Jon Richardson wrote:
> Plugins are a big deal (see
> http://oneofmanyworlds.blogspot.in/2012/03/difficult-decision.html for a
> recent example.) In this era of mashups and breakneck innovation,
> developers must rely on vast amounts of code they've never seen,
2012/3/31 reeze :
> Hi,
> From the NEWS file :
>
> + . Fixed bug #55475 (is_a() triggers autoloader, new optional 3rd argument
> to
> +is_a and is_subclass_of). (alan_k)
>
> The 3rd argument is add to let user choose autoload or not, but not a string
> or not.
>
> so maybe we can make it more
2012/3/31 reeze :
> 在 2012年3月31日星期六，下午3:31，Stas Malyshev 写道：
>
> On 3/30/12 7:27 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
> Hi Stas,
>
> Just FYI.
> Following bugs are needed to be fixed before 5.4.1, I think.
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61526
> Which is right, doc or code?
>
>
> Both. The parameter means
Hi,
From the NEWS file :
+ . Fixed bug #55475 (is_a() triggers autoloader, new optional 3rd argument to
+ is_a and is_subclass_of). (alan_k)
The 3rd argument is add to let user choose autoload or not, but not a string or
not.
so maybe we can make it more clear.
--
reeze
已使用 Sparrow (http:/
在 2012年3月31日星期六，下午3:31，Stas Malyshev 写道：
> On 3/30/12 7:27 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > Hi Stas,
> >
> > Just FYI.
> > Following bugs are needed to be fixed before 5.4.1, I think.
> >
> > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61526
> > Which is right, doc or code?
>
> Both. The parameter means that
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61526
>> Which is right, doc or code?
>
> Both. The parameter means that first argument (object) can be a string,
> and if it is, it will be passed to autoloader to find the class. See bug
> #55475 for the discussion.
We should improve doc
Hi!
> That's not true. There is a weekly reminder email if you have
> outstanding open bugs assigned to you. Although I haven't seen one for a
> little while, so we may finally have given up on that since it was
> completely ineffective.
Actually, this one I'd like to keep - though I'd prefer mon
Hi!
> 2) Keep devs' attention on known failures - XFAIL doesn't solve that.
> You remember about them when you run tests and if you want make
> attention at them.
Which devs you are referring to? Why you assume their attention needs help?
> What I propose is a single *daily* newsletter saying "H
On 03/30/2012 11:25 PM, Alexey Shein wrote:
> Hmm, that's different. You get a notification if there's some change
> on that bug (new comment/state changed/patch etc.). If bug didn't
> change for years, you won't get any notifications -> it's more likely
> you forget about it.
That's not true. The
On 3/30/12 7:27 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> Just FYI.
> Following bugs are needed to be fixed before 5.4.1, I think.
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61526
> Which is right, doc or code?
Both. The parameter means that first argument (object) can be a string,
and if it is, it will b
Hi Stas
I'm not sure what is the correct behavior, but if is_subclass_of() is
behaving wrong, it is better to be fixed before 5.4.1 (and 5.3.11 also)
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61526
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To un
44 matches
Mail list logo
