On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> I'm not sure this bug is critical enough to keep messing with the code
>>> base
>>> this close to the release. Could you please describe what is the current
>>> status, what was before the fix and what exactly the problems are here?
On 8 February 2012 04:09, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Specifically, how about the attached patch (also available at
>> http://www.adamharvey.name/patches/osx-max_execution_time-test-patch.diff,
>> in case the mailing list decides to strip it)? This only patches the
>> test to XFAIL this test on OS X,
On 02/07/12 14:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 07.02.2012 13:39, schrieb Matti Bickel:
>> According to
>> http://hilfe-center.1und1.de/hosting/scripte_datenbanken/php/6.html the
>> advertised PHP6 is probably PHP5.4RC6...
> what has this do do with PHP6?
That page seem to list all php configurations
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> > Works for me. But I'd like to test it after it's been reverted. Will
> > there be one more RC?
>
> I'm not sure there is need for an RC for the revert, as we're
> basically go to the code that already existed for years. Do you think
> we still need
Hi!
Works for me. But I'd like to test it after it's been reverted. Will
there be one more RC?
I'm not sure there is need for an RC for the revert, as we're basically
go to the code that already existed for years. Do you think we still
need one?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
Sug
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this bug is critical enough to keep messing with the
> > > code base this close to the release. Could you please describe
> > > what is the current status, what was before the fix and what
> > > exactly the problems are here?
> >
> > l
Hi!
I'm not sure this bug is critical enough to keep messing with the code base
this close to the release. Could you please describe what is the current
status, what was before the fix and what exactly the problems are here?
Hi Stats,
let me try to describe the whole thing. before any cha
Hi!
Specifically, how about the attached patch (also available at
http://www.adamharvey.name/patches/osx-max_execution_time-test-patch.diff,
in case the mailing list decides to strip it)? This only patches the
test to XFAIL this test on OS X, which makes the PHP_5_4 test suite
run without any un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> This following patch looks good to me:
> Derick, thanks ,
>
> Stas, should I commit this into 5.4 now or hold from ci until the
> release of 5.4?
Please wait for stas okay, but personally I want to see this committed.
>
> thanks
>>
>>> Index:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Laruence wrote:
>
>> there comes a new bug relate to this change, #60978, in php_cli.c
>>
>> case PHP_MODE_CLI_DIRECT:
>> cli_register_file_handles(TSRMLS_C);
>> if (zend_eval_string_ex(ex
Am 07.02.2012 13:39, schrieb Matti Bickel:
> On 02/04/2012 09:26 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>> I'm just looking into my annual dedicated server update since it's the
>> only way to get the current contract prices, and I find that ! and 1 are
>> still advertising support for PHP6 Beta :) I wonder how
On 02/04/2012 09:26 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> I'm just looking into my annual dedicated server update since it's the
> only way to get the current contract prices, and I find that ! and 1 are
> still advertising support for PHP6 Beta :) I wonder how many more ISP's
> are keeping up with them ...
>
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Laruence wrote:
> there comes a new bug relate to this change, #60978, in php_cli.c
>
>case PHP_MODE_CLI_DIRECT:
> cli_register_file_handles(TSRMLS_C);
> if (zend_eval_string_ex(exec_direct, NULL, "Command line
> code", 1 TSRMLS_CC) == FAILUR
On 3 February 2012 12:15, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 3 February 2012 12:05, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>>> For me at least, tests/func/005a.phpt is the last failing test on
>>> PHP_5_4 on my OS X machine, so it would be nice to get this cleared up
>>> pre-5.4.0 to help get cleaner test suite results.
>>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo