Yes :) I sent you an other mail about this bug yesterday to confirm
that I can commit it.
P.
On 20 January 2012 13:05, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> Nevery mind. Apparently Dmitry committed a patch for this one.
>
>
> I think what he committed was a patch for another problem - double free in
Hi!
Nevery mind. Apparently Dmitry committed a patch for this one.
I think what he committed was a patch for another problem - double free
in traits.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developmen
Nevery mind. Apparently Dmitry committed a patch for this one.
P.
On 20 January 2012 08:04, Pierrick Charron wrote:
> Ok i'll only commit it on trunk and 5.3 for right now and keep the
> patch ready to apply. What about the other one I sent you (60809) ?
>
> On 20 January 2012 02:10, Stas Malysh
Ok i'll only commit it on trunk and 5.3 for right now and keep the
patch ready to apply. What about the other one I sent you (60809) ?
On 20 January 2012 02:10, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> I did run the test of bug #55871 and got memory leaks. This patch
>> remove them. Could you please rev
hi,
I'm not sure to follow you here, what did change that this issue is
now a PHP problem?
Felipe's fix sounds correct to me.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> Hey Pierre,
>
> I was wondering if you'd be willing to pitch a rollback of r300894
> post-code-freeze. If not,
Hi Stats,
2012/1/20 Stas Malyshev :
> I'd propose to make a binary-compatible change for 5.3 and 5.4.1, and
> discuss what we do for trunk - I still like the idea of keeping less
> handlers better, and if that means we can have the same patch for all
> branches, then it's an added bonus.
Ok, then
hi Bill,
2012/1/20 William A. Rowe Jr. :
> On 1/19/2012 5:29 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> 2012/1/19 Ángel González :
>>
>>> Such binaries wouldn't be compatible with IIS, but mingw seems preferible
>>> to the legacy VC6 for use with the oficial Apache binaries.
>
> A couple of things to remember; msv
Hi!
We can make new session ID in PS_OPEN_FUNC() or PS_READ_FUNC() always
when ID is not already initialized one, by calling private validation
function from
PS_OPEN_FUNC() or PS_READ_FUNC(). However, I think it's more cleaner to
keep PS module's modular architecture.
Current session module's c
Hi Stats,
2012/1/20 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
>
>> Hi Stats,
>>
>> Ok, I'll hold committing to 5.4, but commit it only to trunk.
>>
>> Any comments form anyone? for committing to trunk?
>> Patch details and user land counter measure are in RFC.
>
>
> Re-reading the discussion, I see that the questi
