Hi:
I have submitted a patch, you can have a try:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=60627&patch=bug60627.patch&revision=1325663174
thanks
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone have a look to this annoying bug ?
>
> I have try to move tsmr_startup to
Hi:
sorry, I didn't put that clearly, I mean, in trigger E_ERROR in
php_register_variable will cause php-cgi process exit.
and dmitry has fixed that by change the E_ERROR to E_WARNING,
my patch is doing the same thing but in another way
thanks
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Stas Maly
Hi!
it seems you have fix the issue that error in register_variable
will cause php process exit.
here is a fix I made before: http://pastebin.com/7BLAVaWr , I
think maybe this is a lighter fix.
could you review this? if you think this is okey, I will commit it.
Could you p
Hi dmitry:
it seems you have fix the issue that error in register_variable
will cause php process exit.
here is a fix I made before: http://pastebin.com/7BLAVaWr , I
think maybe this is a lighter fix.
could you review this? if you think this is okey, I will commit it.
thanks
Hi,
Can someone have a look to this annoying bug ?
I have try to move tsmr_startup to pre_config hook, but with no success.
I don't see any change in sapi/apache2handler which explain this issue
(no issue with 5.3.x, so must look somewhere else)
I really like to see ZTS available for apache use
On 2011-12-29, David Soria Parra wrote:
> here is a short update on the current status of the
> git migration.
Thanks for all the ground work you're doing making this happen!
> - php-src will be migrated after PHP 5.4 final
>Stas wants to have PHP 5.4 final out before we migrate
>the re
On 2011-12-22, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 10:51 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > Am 22.12.2011 19:41, schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf:
> > > This is not a step forward. If the author of age_check() really
> > > doesn't want to accept type-juggled arguments, then it is easy
> > > enough to do a
On Monday, January 2, 2012, JS wrote:
> I think the proposed syntax will create a lot of code readability issues.
> Have you considered an alternate syntax:
>
What readability issues? The proposed syntax matches that of C# and Java.
The idea is to use a syntax already familiar to most developer
