Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Laruence
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT > wrote: >> 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov : >>> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature >>> addition and the release is already in RC. >> >> +1 >> >> @Laruence >> Can you re

Re: [PHP-DEV] Local time zone

2011-12-13 Thread Oleg Oshmyan
>> Which is why a pseudo-timezone called System is needed so that guesses >> do not have to be made. The extension would then convert >> /etc/localtime to its internal time zone description format or just >> use system-provided APIs as it used to do before PHP 5.1 if I >> understand correctly. >>

[PHP-DEV] SVN Account Request: levim

2011-12-13 Thread Levi Morrison
philip_ suggested that I get an svn account to change various documentation issues in the SPL. I've submitted a patch for enhancing SplFixedArray. I love kittens. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for OpenSSL extension to implement SPKAC functions

2011-12-13 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, Thanks for the patch! On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Jason Gerfen wrote: > I posted this patch early last week to the list and did not see any > activity about it. According to the page (http://php.net/svn-php.php) > I should re-submit after a week just in case, so without further > adieu.

[PHP-DEV] Patch for OpenSSL extension to implement SPKAC functions

2011-12-13 Thread Jason Gerfen
I posted this patch early last week to the list and did not see any activity about it. According to the page (http://php.net/svn-php.php) I should re-submit after a week just in case, so without further adieu. This is a simple implementation of four new functions to the OpenSSL extensions to handl

Re: [PHP-DEV] Local time zone

2011-12-13 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Oleg Oshmyan wrote: > > This might work on some distrbutions, but not nearly on all. And > > definitely not on Windows. On Debian it's not a symlink for example. > > It is still usable as one of the possibilities for the guessing algorithm > to examine. > > Initially I also

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-CVS] Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-CVS] svn: /web/pecl/trunk/ include/pear-prepend.php public_html/error/404.php public_html/package-changelog.php public_html/package-info

2011-12-13 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 19:45, Christopher Jones wrote: > > > On 12/07/2011 05:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> again, it was told, many times. > > > Hi Pierre, > > Searching (via Thunderbird's not so excellent search) didn't > immediately give any obvious hits (in your many emails!)  Maybe that > w

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Pierre Joye
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov : >> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature >> addition and the release is already in RC. > > +1 > > @Laruence > Can you remove the voting widget? I would reset the vote and make the vote

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Patrick ALLAERT
2011/12/13 Nikita Popov : > This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature > addition and the release is already in RC. +1 @Laruence Can you remove the voting widget? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Oleg Oshmyan
> Call for voting about the const array/string derefernce RFC now. > > you can find more info here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference#vote I have always wondered why array dereference does not just work on arbitrary expressions in PHP like other operators do. Even with the latest modifi

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Laruence
Hi: thanks for pointing this out. yes, maybe 5.4.1 thanks On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Nikita Popov wrote: > This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature > addition and the release is already in RC. > > Nikita > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Laruence wrote: >>

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Laruence
Hi: should consistent with : wrote: >> >> echo "foobar"["foo"][0]; > > > "foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"? > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nikita Popov > wrote: > >> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature >> addition and the release is already in RC.

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
Hi all, On Tue Dec 13 09:32:43 2011, Morfi wrote: echo "foobar"["foo"][0]; "foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"? Exactly. The index/key "foo" does not really exist in the string "foobar" because a string is more an indexed array of characters than a combination of substrings (as the

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference

2011-12-13 Thread Morfi
> > echo "foobar"["foo"][0]; "foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"? On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: > This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature > addition and the release is already in RC. > > Nikita > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Laruen