Hello Internals,
We followed our 14 days cycle for release candidates, so today is
release day.
The PHP team announces the availability of the third release candidates
of PHP 5.3.9 and PHP 5.4.0 today:
You can find the packages for PHP 5.3.9RC3 here:
http://downloads.php.net/johannes
and r
The usage is very limited as well, for STDIN that is. For other
streams, non blocking works perfectly. Also last time I checked it was
not possible to do it without some heavy changes, it can't be done in
5.3 or 5.4 as of now (respectively stable and release candidate
phases).
I'd to say that asyn
It is non-trivial to implement on Windows. It is more of a feature request than
a bug. UNIX supports non-blocking stdin natively, Windows doesn't. A Windows
guy would need to write a compatibility layer to get this to work and we don't
have very many Windows guys around.
-Rasmus
On Dec 8, 2011
hi,
As a windows developer and user, and core developer of PHP as well as
contributor to many OSS projects to help them to support windows
better and keep the code portable, I'd to say that to base a project
on .net is a wrong start to begin with. A very wrong one. And I really
like .net, I only w
Hello,
Is there any intention to fix Bug #34972
(https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=34972)? It was first submitted six
years ago, but the bug still seems to exist.
Thanks.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 12/08/2011 03:53 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> This is a complete non-starter. The bulk of PHP users are on
> non-Windows, especially Linux, and Mono performance on Linux is really
> not good. Last time I checked it was an order of magnitude slower on
> Linux compared to the same hardware running
On 12/08/2011 03:28 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> Don't take this the wrong way, I'm merely trying to provoke your thoughts a
> bit with this e-mail! :-)
>
> Has it occurred to anyone, to abandon the official PHP codebase and adopt
> Phalanger instead?
>
> Some convincing (to me) points:
>
> - Pha
Don't take this the wrong way, I'm merely trying to provoke your thoughts a
bit with this e-mail! :-)
Has it occurred to anyone, to abandon the official PHP codebase and adopt
Phalanger instead?
Some convincing (to me) points:
- Phalanger runs on Mono, meaning similar platform-reach as PHP. (but
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 18:29, Michael Maclean wrote:
> On 30/09/11 12:37, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> Preferably replace it with Kyoto Cabinet support I suppose.
>
>
> I added the TC support initially, so I can look at replacing it over the
> weekend.
Whats the status on this?
-Hannes
--
PHP
Slightly off topic - but this is definitely a part of the PHP project I'm
qualified to help (documentation writing) with in some capacity. Who would
I get in contact with to get an assignment? Just the PHP docs list or
someone specific? (I'm subbed to the internals list, I dunno if I'm subbed
to
10 matches
Mail list logo
