Hi:
patch upateded, http://pastebin.com/cr6N7NUx
thanks
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I am plan to commit a new change to 5.4-trunk/.gdbinit which can be
> found at http://pastebin.com/N6hTRMRA.
>
> after update, the zbacktrace will print arguments info:
>
>
Hi:
I am plan to commit a new change to 5.4-trunk/.gdbinit which can be
found at http://pastebin.com/N6hTRMRA.
after update, the zbacktrace will print arguments info:
(gdb) zbacktrace
[0x95dac5d8] sleep(long: 1000) /tmp/1.php:21
[0x95dac4b8] e(resource(#5)) /tmp/1.php:17
[0x95dac3e8] d(bo
> Thanks so much for the patch. Looking at the source I noticed some
> small things (care to build a bike shed with me? :).
>
> Many of the test EXPECT's have %d changed to hard coded line numbers and
> others have %s changed to hard coded file names. In some of them,
> that's all that changed
I believe the attempt with the RFC was to mimic the syntax that C# went with,
the RFC is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax
The first public would apply to either of the get/set which did not have it
further defined, for example:
public $Hours {
get { ... }
priv
Hi all,
I am writing an extension that does performance monitoring. I guess
somewhat like xdebug but a bit different. The user can specify the
functions / methods they care about and I will time the execution of those
things. I do this by hooking zend_execute. My hook is:
void
rrdmon_execute
2011/12/4 Clint M Priest :
> Updated patch w/o white-space:
http://www.clintpriest.com/patches/accessors_v1.patch
>
> In the end it is a relatively simple patch. The new syntax effectively
creates internal functions on the object and the system looks for those
functions and calls them at the appro
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, James Edmunds wrote:
> I am new to this list and I am wondering if this is the appropriate place to
> ask a question about the internals for an extension, or is there a more
> appropriate list for that purpose? My issue is fairly technical and involved
> with the deep guts of Z
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:27 PM, James Edmunds wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am new to this list and I am wondering if this is the appropriate place
> to ask a question about the internals for an extension, or is there a more
> appropriate list for that purpose? My issue is fairly technical and
> inv
Hello all,
I am new to this list and I am wondering if this is the appropriate place
to ask a question about the internals for an extension, or is there a more
appropriate list for that purpose? My issue is fairly technical and
involved with the deep guts of Zend so I suspect this may be the r
Whether you are purchasing a new subscription, renewing an old one, or
advertising with us all purchases allow you to choose one of many wonderful
holiday gifts.
It's our way of thanking you for your business.
Visit our Holiday Special Page and look around. There are some great gifts for
Hi Alan:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:59:50AM -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> I tried to apply the patch to 54 and trunk via "patch < bug.diff"
> (which usually works fine) and all hunks failled. Not sure what I'm
> doing wrong.
Ah, I needed to do "patch -p0 < bug.diff" But now that I applied
Hi Alan:
> https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=60362&patch=fix_disabling_bad_string_offsets&revision=1323002696
Thanks so much for the patch. Looking at the source I noticed some
small things (care to build a bike shed with me? :).
Many of the test EXPECT's have %d changed to hard coded
12 matches
Mail list logo
