+1 for this
there is a little worried about that, is changing %%expect okey? (of
course I am not talking about that rewrite all the rules then fix the
r/s conflicts)
thanks
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 11/5/11 2:04 PM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>>>
>>> Other exa
Hi!
On 11/5/11 2:04 PM, Peter Cowburn wrote:
Other examples which describes the feature at
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call
Thoughts?
Bump.
What's the current status on this?
It would be nice to this teeny little patch in for 5.4.0 if possible.
I think the brackets one is fin
Interested in developing the PHP language. I know c and c++ and would like to
contribute.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 26 November 2010 19:36, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm here again to presents another proposal, which adds support for
> instantiating a class and calling its methods and accessing its properties
> on same command.
>
> Example:
>
>
> class bar {
> public $x = 'PHP';
> }
>
> class foo exte
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:42, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that the mail will be sent on each configuration build
> > (debian 32bit, debian 64bit, freebsd 32bit, freebsd 64bit), which is of
> > course a little bit too much, I
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:42, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> I just noticed that the mail will be sent on each configuration build
> (debian 32bit, debian 64bit, freebsd 32bit, freebsd 64bit), which is of
> course a little bit too much, I'm looking into resolving this, so to only
> send email on the pare
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr wrote:
>>>
Hi:
On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> > I almost forget to mention, but the email n