Hi!
On 10/16/11 5:54 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Such a performance regression sounds like an appropriate "punishment" to
me for deploying bad code ;-)
By bad code you mean not obsessively checking for stuff that is of no
importance to them as programmers and is only required because
On 10/12/2011 07:59 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Note that on 99% of real PHP code, dozens of "errors" may happen due to
multitude of notices and E_STRICTs that we have now and we have no means
to disable until the very last moment before printing them.
Such a performance regression sounds like an
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-10-17，6:03，Felipe Pena 写道：
> Hi,
>
> 2011/10/7 Ferenc Kovacs :
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi all,
>>>
>>> ...
Other examples which describes the feature at
http://w
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Yes, the security problem was present before the fix was applied
No, it was not. See the examples in the links I pasted earlier.
The code was safe, under controlled context, before this change has
applied. With the change the code become
Hi!
On 10/16/11 2:14 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
We have discussed that already on security, I barely see a reason to
begin this discussion again. There is a clear possible security
problem, clearly identified and not present before this "fix" was
applied. It is easy to fix and does not make PHP wors
Hi,
2011/10/7 Ferenc Kovacs :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner wrote:
>> On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> Other examples which describes the feature at
>>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> F
hi Harald,
Please be sure to open a bug at bugs.php.net and attach the info there
too (backtrace, reproduce script, etc.).
Cheers,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Harald Lapp wrote:
> hi stefan,
>
> Am 16.10.11 20:42, schrieb Stefan Marr:
>>
>> Hi Harald:
>>
>> On 16 Oct 2011, at 20:31, Harald
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 10/16/11 3:39 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> There was example codes in previous discussions, here and on security.
>> The document used for the CVE assignment has some as well.
>>
>>
>> http://www.byte.nl/blog/2011/09/23/security-bu
Hi!
On 10/16/11 3:39 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
There was example codes in previous discussions, here and on security.
The document used for the CVE assignment has some as well.
http://www.byte.nl/blog/2011/09/23/security-bug-in-is_a-function-in-php-5-3-7-5-3-8/
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=5547
hi stefan,
Am 16.10.11 20:42, schrieb Stefan Marr:
Hi Harald:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 20:31, Harald Lapp wrote:
with the current php-5.4 beta my processes are dying, but with the lates
snapshot, not -- i still get the message:
There have been a number of bug fixes since the last beta.
The list
Am 16.10.11 20:40, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
https://bugs.php.net/bugs-generating-backtrace.php
hi,
great! this seems to be the information, i was looking for. let's see if
i can get anything useful out of it :)
harald
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscr
Hi Harald:
On 16 Oct 2011, at 20:31, Harald Lapp wrote:
> with the current php-5.4 beta my processes are dying, but with the lates
> snapshot, not -- i still get the message:
There have been a number of bug fixes since the last beta.
The list is here:
https://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_f
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Harald Lapp wrote:
> hi,
>
> i wonder if anybody out there already tried traits in more complex php
> applications. i am currently trying to rewrite part of a somehow complex
> application to use traits and i have the problem, that my scripts are dying,
> as soon
hi,
i wonder if anybody out there already tried traits in more complex php
applications. i am currently trying to rewrite part of a somehow complex
application to use traits and i have the problem, that my scripts are
dying, as soon as i include the trait.
with the current php-5.4 beta my pr
hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 10/7/11 11:13 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>> The UPGRADING file is also completely worthless.
>> I have no idea what is going on, as a dev, nor as a documentor.
>> Be it traits, closures, or whatever random new parameter or
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 10/13/11 5:06 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>> I agree that it is slightly messy, but we have painted ourselves into a
>> bit of a corner with the 5.3 mess. Stas, the whole point here is that
>> changing the is_a() default in 5.3 ca
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Following Hanness' mail a week or so ago, I went over NEWS and the wiki and
> here is the list of undocumented stuff we have now in 5.4. It may be not
> complete, so if you know of any other undocumented stuff please tell (and
> submi
17 matches
Mail list logo
