Ferenc, yes I know you are generally -1 on reverting this.
Currently this bug has 20 votes all at 'this seriously affects me'
I know Pierre and I are +1 for reverting this change
I think Zeev and Stas where -1 for reverting
I've already seen bugs on random packages (outside PEAR) reporting
pro
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alan Knowles wrote:
> Let's try and close this one.
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55475
>
> I've just added a patch that adds is_class_of(), which is identical to
> is_subclass_of, and has the new feature of supporting strings and using the
> autoloader.
>
>
Let's try and close this one.
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55475
I've just added a patch that adds is_class_of(), which is identical to
is_subclass_of, and has the new feature of supporting strings and using
the autoloader.
It then reverts is_a() back to the previous behavior, and clarifi
Hi!
On 9/20/11 12:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
but it is not logical
foo() in B can do anything with $a before or after parent::foo()
and the caller does not need to know at any point that B
has anything to do with the class A
Consider this code:
function doFoo(A $a) {
$a->foo();
}
It's fi
but it is not logical
foo() in B can do anything with $a before or after parent::foo()
and the caller does not need to know at any point that B
has anything to do with the class A
Am 20.09.2011 19:40, schrieb Stas Malyshev:Hi!
On 9/19/11 2:32 AM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> The thing if you introduce
Hi!
On 9/19/11 8:34 AM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Sure, you can do it. But if you do, you're lying about the
interface. You're telling the callers that you expect no arguments,
but then all of a sudden you error out.
Well, we have no way of declaring that we accept an undefined number of
argu
Hi!
On 9/19/11 7:26 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
that point, why even bother with interfaces? The interface defines
what should be accepted, and any method that implements it should
accept exactly that (no more, no less, no different). Otherwise
Here you lost me. Why exactly you can not accept
Hi!
On 9/19/11 3:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
If we talk about implementing the abstract concept and we use the
interface model to do it, then we do it wrong. I'm out of other
arguments, or maybe one new one, if we implement abstract like
interface, then let kill abstract support, we don't need tha
Hi!
On 9/19/11 2:50 AM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
* It had to be case that the parameters you want to ignore are the last
Of course, but that's a very common scenario - important parameters go
first, unimportant go last. Or, if I wanted, I could just have blank
signature foo() and figure it out i
Hi!
On 9/19/11 2:32 AM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
The thing if you introduce func_get_args() to the argument, any discussion
about enforcing signatures becomes meaningless. One could argue this
should be allowed:
class A {
function foo() {}
}
class B extends A {
function foo($a) {}
}
No, this can
Hi:
np, :)
thanks
2011/9/20 Scott Aubrey :
> Hi Laurence
>
> This seems to work with the latest snapshot (201109201230) but not in beta1
> that I *was* testing with.
>
> Sorry for bothering you,
>
> Thanks
>
> - Scott
>
> Scott Aubrey
> Systems Developer
> Christians Against Poverty UK - [capu
Hi Laurence
This seems to work with the latest snapshot (201109201230) but not in beta1
that I *was* testing with.
Sorry for bothering you,
Thanks
- Scott
Scott Aubrey
Systems Developer
Christians Against Poverty UK - [capuk.org]
On 20 Sep 2011, at 15:42, Laruence wrote:
> Hi :
> I can
Hi :
I can not reproduce this.
could you try with 5.4beta or svn-trunk?
thanks
2011/9/20 Scott Aubrey :
> Hi list.
>
> display_errors seems to have no effect when using the new CLI-Webserver. Is
> this expected?
>
> I've tried setting display_errors to 1, On and stderr, and doing standard
Hi list.
display_errors seems to have no effect when using the new CLI-Webserver. Is
this expected?
I've tried setting display_errors to 1, On and stderr, and doing standard
fopen/fwrite/fclose to php://stdout or php://stderr works as expected.
Before I report a bug, I want to be sure it's no
14 matches
Mail list logo
