Hi:
new patch:
#55128 SplFixedArray::fromArray() does not use extended class
thanks
2011/7/25 Laruence :
> Hi:
> recently I was working on PHP bugs.
>
> and submit 3 patches,
>
> #36944 strncmp & negative len https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=36944
> #54556 array access to
On 07/25/2011 02:05 PM, Stefan Marr wrote:
> Hi Johannes:
>
> 2011/7/25 Johannes Schlüter :
>
>> Now I use reflection on this:
>>
>> $rc = new ReflectionClass('C');
>> print_r($rc->getTraitAliases());
>>
>> Array
>> (
>>[tc] => T1::t1
>> )
>
> Great, that is nice.
>
>
>> So far so nice but
Hi Johannes:
2011/7/25 Johannes Schlüter :
> Now I use reflection on this:
>
> $rc = new ReflectionClass('C');
> print_r($rc->getTraitAliases());
>
> Array
> (
> [tc] => T1::t1
> )
Great, that is nice.
> So far so nice but I'm missing the information where C::t1() is coming
> from. In the r
While looking over the release notes for 5.4a1
(http://www.php.net/archive/2011.php#id2011-06-28-1) I noticed that
the related session_* functions had been removed.
As I interpreted it, this goes against the spirit of the release RFC
for x.y+1.z releases, specifically:
- Backward compatibility mu
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 00:03 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:02 PM, IraQue IraQue wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi there PHP!
> >> >
> >> > I am developing a new web server, and i would like to make it possible
> >> > to include PHP in it.
As Ferenc said best is to use FastCGI b
Stefan,
I recently tried to finalize reflection support for traits. Given code
like
Now I use reflection on this:
$rc = new ReflectionClass('C');
print_r($rc->getTraitAliases());
Array
(
[tc] => T1::t1
)
So far so nice but I'm missing the information where C::t1() is coming
from. In the
Hi:
recently I was working on PHP bugs.
and submit 3 patches,
#36944 strncmp & negative len https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=36944
#54556 array access to empty var does not trigger a notice
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54556
#55211 ArrayObject::getArrayObject () shou
Hi Pierre,
Is this a technical limitation, or just something you're not
particularly interested in doing?
John.
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 19:04 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> yeah, just re read it and I realized that I miss the zend guard part,
> which is definitively not on my todos, and will never b
2011/7/25 Gwynne Raskind :
> On this subject, I've been looking into what produces the largest
> warnings spam with a decent set of warnings turned on, and I'd like to
> recommend this patch. I can't commit it myself (I don't have Zend
> karma), nor would I care to without getting some opinion on i
On 23 July 2011 23:29, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> hi.
>
> We had a discussion about the magic_quotes removal that it is weird
> that even though that mq was deprecated in 5.3, we still have/had that
> enabled by default (if you didn't set it from the command line or
> through a php.ini, the default va
Hello. Can someone check my patch in this request
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53946 ?
It would be nice to see it in PHP 5.4 .
If a question arises why this is necessary, then see my comments on this
bug.
Thanks in advance.
With respect, Alexander Moskaliov
ir...@irker.net
11 matches
Mail list logo