Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SVN Account Request: lytboris

2011-01-11 Thread Christopher Jones
On 12/22/2010 11:03 AM, Lytochkin Boris wrote: Hi. I would suggest to first open a bug report, attach the patch and then let see how it goes, and repeat it for the next couple patches :) This is the usual way to get a SVN account. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53594 But it seems it will go

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend engine's hashtable performance tweaks

2011-01-11 Thread Christopher Jones
Hi Marcin, Can you mail the PHP Internals list and also the apc-...@lists.php.net list when you have logged the bug? I mentioned your patches to Gopal, the APC maintainer, and he was interested to see what was needed. Regards, Chris On 01/11/2011 04:28 PM, Marcin Babij wrote: Hello, I merge

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend engine's hashtable performance tweaks

2011-01-11 Thread Christopher Jones
On 12/31/2010 10:15 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: hi, Thanks for the patches :) Can you open a bug report please (and attach the patches to it)? I'm sure this patch will be updated a couple of times before it reaches the repository. Cheers, Hi Marcin, Did you log a bug for this? Regards, Chris

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Selecting Namespaces and Tag styles at include time. ( was Re: PHP Dev RFC Selecting Namespaces and Tag styles at include time.)

2011-01-11 Thread Christopher Jones
On 01/11/2011 02:03 PM, Michael Morris wrote: Bumping this after about a 3 week lull. How would I go about adding this to the wiki?? The normal way: get a wiki account and create an RFC. I believe this is the the place to request wiki access: http://wiki.php.net/start?do=register I didn't se

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Selecting Namespaces and Tag styles at include time. ( was Re: PHP Dev RFC Selecting Namespaces and Tag styles at include time.)

2011-01-11 Thread Michael Morris
Bumping this after about a 3 week lull. How would I go about adding this to the wiki?? On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Michael Morris wrote: > That would make for an easier situation. If we don't worry about legacy > for a moment that would give us this cleaner bitfield. > > Bit > 0 -- Standar