Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process

2011-01-03 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On 1/2/11 11:56 PM, Christian Kaps wrote: > Am 03.01.2011 02:41, schrieb Enrico Weigelt: > >>> >>> No, as usual on Gentoo, config files are never overwritten, but >>> written to another place and tools like etc-update show you the >>> differences. I've merged the configs manually, and I'm pretty >

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process

2011-01-03 Thread Matti Bickel
On 01/03/2011 02:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Hence a new /etc/php layout, hence the need to migrate your >> config. > > Hm, i am not a gentoo user but this is not so fine as long most users > have installed only one php-version Yeah, right now talking about having a symlink to the active confi

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process

2011-01-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.01.2011 14:00, schrieb Matti Bickel: > On 01/03/2011 08:56 AM, Christian Kaps wrote: >> Since ebuild php-5.3.3 Gentoo introduced a set of new features. > > Which includes the possibility to have each minor version of PHP > installed in parallel. Sounds nice > Hence a new /etc/php layout,

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process

2011-01-03 Thread Matti Bickel
On 01/03/2011 08:56 AM, Christian Kaps wrote: > Since ebuild php-5.3.3 Gentoo introduced a set of new features. Which includes the possibility to have each minor version of PHP installed in parallel. Hence a new /etc/php layout, hence the need to migrate your config. Which I foolishly assumed user

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Ben Schmidt
On 3/01/11 8:57 PM, Stefan Marr wrote: Hi Ben: On 03 Jan 2011, at 10:35, Ben Schmidt wrote: OK. So this comment from your email is outdated?: Yes, outdated since this email: http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=129288735205036&w=2 Best regards Stefan OK, Stefan, I just got confused by read

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Stefan Marr
Hi Ben: On 03 Jan 2011, at 10:35, Ben Schmidt wrote: > > OK. So this comment from your email is outdated?: Yes, outdated since this email: http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=129288735205036&w=2 Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 /

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Ben Schmidt
Hi, Stefan, On 3/01/11 8:16 PM, Stefan Marr wrote: On 03 Jan 2011, at 10:04, Ben Schmidt wrote: In this email thread you seemed to be saying that properties defined in traits are completely ignored, but in the RFC and svn it seems to be saying that properties in traits are not ignored, but are

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Stefan Marr
Hi Ben: On 03 Jan 2011, at 10:04, Ben Schmidt wrote: > In this email thread you seemed to be saying that properties defined in > traits are completely ignored, but in the RFC and svn it seems to be > saying that properties in traits are not ignored, but are merged into > the class and/or trigger

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Ben Schmidt
Hi, Stefan, Sorry, I do not understand. Haha. Now we are both confused! In this email thread you seemed to be saying that properties defined in traits are completely ignored, but in the RFC and svn it seems to be saying that properties in traits are not ignored, but are merged into the class

Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits and Properties

2011-01-03 Thread Stefan Marr
Hi Ben: On 03 Jan 2011, at 06:58, Ben Schmidt wrote: > I'm a latecomer here, but... > > Stefan, doesn't this conflict with what you've written here (and the > test cases in SVN)?: > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/horizontalreuse#handling_of_propertiesstate > > Or is what is happening here that the p