On 18 November 2010 15:22, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> As much as I'd like to see magic quotes burning in hell (had the option to
> kill them when they were small, but unfortunately didn't), I'm wondering
> whether the people +1'ing are thinking about the potential consequences to
> doing this, and i
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Garfield [mailto:la...@garfieldtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:41 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Magic quotes in trunk
>
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:19:05 pm Philip Olson wrote:
> > > What are your inp
On Nov 17, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:19:05 pm Philip Olson wrote:
>>> What are your inputs on this matter?
>>
>> I'm struggling with this topic. We must do something, but it's important to
>> understand that plenty of people unknowingly rely upo
Mike,
Can you log a bug for this at http://bugs.php.net/report.php ?
Certainly. Here it is:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53338
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:19:05 pm Philip Olson wrote:
> > What are your inputs on this matter?
>
> I'm struggling with this topic. We must do something, but it's important to
> understand that plenty of people unknowingly rely upon this security
> feature that's still enabled by default.
> What are your inputs on this matter?
I'm struggling with this topic. We must do something, but it's important to
understand that plenty of people unknowingly rely upon this security feature
that's still enabled by default. Granted 5.3 does generate E_DEPRECATED errors
when magical quotes are
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 5:56:05 am Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Arvids Godjuks
> > >
> > > wrote:
> >> Hello Internals!
> >>
> >> For me, as a user-land developer, this issue seems as if some people
>
On 11/17/2010 8:46 PM, Adam Harvey wrote:
On 18 November 2010 00:08, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
What are your inputs on this matter?
+1 for removing magic quotes completely from trunk. Kill it with fire.
Adam
+infinity. Burn baby burn. (Hudson Ford reference intended...unless
that make
On 11/17/2010 03:40 PM, Mike Harsch wrote:
I'm happy to help however I can to get this feature working again. I don't have
much experience with autoconf, so it's likely that my patch is sub-optimal, but
I've tested it on Solaris and Mac OS X and I know it works (conversely, I can
assure you
+1 for removal
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Stanley Sufficool wrote:
> +1 for removal
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
+1 for removal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 18 November 2010 00:08, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> What are your inputs on this matter?
+1 for removing magic quotes completely from trunk. Kill it with fire.
Adam
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hi,
If there is no objection I like to apply this patch to 5.3 tomorrow
morning (Europe) so we have it in for 5.3.4RC1. Please raise your
concerns until then. At the very least we can always revert it after
RC1.
Cheers,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Ok, I went throug
Hello php internals list,
My name is Mike Harsch. I'm new here, so please set me straight on
matters of etiquette and protocol.
I've recently been spending a lot of time using the DTrace feature in
the 5.3.99-dev code base (--enable-dtrace). I was disappointed to find
out that Revision 305
Hi Simas:
Thanks for sending me the test cases.
I checked them in, and surprise surprise: it actually was already completely
implemented. I didn't had to touch any code...
So the missing bit was being more explicit in the RFC.
I added a section and an example based on your Singleton code.
Now I
Now that's something we can agree on :D
We can reduce the syntax added to simply being the attribute tag before
the standard syntax for a function call/class creation.
This means functions can be attributes too (as if that is useful...)!
This is a function being used as an attribute
attribut
Hi Nathan:
On 17 Nov 2010, at 19:06, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> So it sounds like implementing an interface directly with a trait has been
> shot down,
Yes, Traits are meant to be compile-time only, they are not used to introduce
typing relationships.
> what I wonder about is will it still work if
Hi,
Simas' question yesterday lead me to take a look at the RFC on the wiki and
I have a quick question.
Specifically on the 'Rejected Features' -> 'Interfaces Propagation' section.
So it sounds like implementing an interface directly with a trait has been
shot down, what I wonder about is will
+1 for removal,
magic quotes stopped being a 'good' thing to do back when I first learnt what
echo did.
Web hosts etc have plenty of version numbers to catch up on/upgrade too before
they get to this being a problem.
(well most anyway)
-Original Message-
From: ka...@php.net [mailto:kall
My opinion is to remove them completely.
Big +1 from me. It is time for the feature to go.
Olivier (iPhone)
Le 2010-11-17 à 11:08, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
Greetings
My personal vote here goes towards removing them entirely.
What are your inputs on this matter?
--
regards,
Kalle S
Yeah,
+1 for remove!
-
Uwe Schindler
theta...@php.net - http://www.php.net
NSAPI SAPI developer
Bremen, Germany
> -Original Message-
> From: kalle@gmail.com [mailto:kalle@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kalle
> Sommer Nielsen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: Intern
+1 for removing it in trunk
Pierrick
On 17 November 2010 11:08, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I wanted to raise this topic before we go Alpha with trunk, regarding
> our beloved magic_quotes feature. There seems to be mixed opinions
> regarding it so I thought I would take it up f
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I wanted to raise this topic before we go Alpha with trunk, regarding
> our beloved magic_quotes feature. There seems to be mixed opinions
> regarding it so I thought I would take it up for discussion.
>
> We have advise
Greetings
I wanted to raise this topic before we go Alpha with trunk, regarding
our beloved magic_quotes feature. There seems to be mixed opinions
regarding it so I thought I would take it up for discussion.
We have advised people not to use magic_quotes, register_globals and
the like for years,
Is this related to http://www.ush.it/2009/02/08/php-filesystem-attack-vectors/ ?
That's a quiet old bug, I'm happy to listen it's now worked on and has a patch.
J.Pauli
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 1
On 15 November 2010 17:07, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'll start a series of topics (in this thread) about meta attribute
> (aka. Annotations) discussion.
> So as soon as we agree on each topic I'll open another point to be discussed.
> Only when we reach some consensus I'll
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Arvids Godjuks > wrote:
>
>> Hello Internals!
>>
>> For me, as a user-land developer, this issue seems as if some people
>> are trying to push the annotations at any cost. What they fail to see,
>> is
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Arvids Godjuks
wrote:
> Hello Internals!
>
> For me, as a user-land developer, this issue seems as if some people
> are trying to push the annotations at any cost. What they fail to see,
> is that annotations are never described what they are and how they can
> be
Hello Internals!
For me, as a user-land developer, this issue seems as if some people
are trying to push the annotations at any cost. What they fail to see,
is that annotations are never described what they are and how they can
be useful in our developer work. Right now I, and I think many other
u
On 17 November 2010 01:54, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I would have no trouble accepting a rejection of annotations on the actual
>> merits, but the interminable sequence of comparisons to phpdoc make it
>> clear to me that people just don't realize the potential of annotations.
>
> People do
I’m not the only one in this thread repeating himself to make a point :)
What I opposed is the notion that ‘everyone wants some sort of meta attribute
support’. Maybe I read too much into it but I read it as implying we need
something substantial that’s new.
Either way, I’m fine with going in
I think everyone is jumping the gun on this. Let's let Alec, et al. finish
the newly proposed RFC and then argue about it. If the consensus is still
that the complexity and drag in the introduced syntax outweighs the
benefits, we put it to bed or try again. Fair enough?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 4:29, "guilhermebla...@gmail.com" <
> guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stas,
> >
> > Ok, so you think I should just consider everyone want some sort of
> > meta attribute support and start discussing the topics
On Nov 17, 2010, at 4:29, "guilhermebla...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> Ok, so you think I should just consider everyone want some sort of
> meta attribute support and start discussing the topics?
Of course not. Assuming meta support requires substantial additions of syntax
then it's ve
Fair enough. I'm bias towards the C# annotation syntax, so that's my
attraction to it.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Dave Ingram wrote:
> On 17/11/10 06:38, Will Fitch wrote:
> > I like the idea, Alec.
> >
> > My only question is, syntactically, what difference would using a
> keyword,
> > i
35 matches
Mail list logo
