On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 20:28 29/05/2010, Chris Stockton wrote:
>
> My biggest issue as a user is the fatal errors. Why are we blowing up on
>> something that should throw some kind of useful argument exception? I end up
>> in my applications using instanceof ev
At 20:34 29/05/2010, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 20:28 29/05/2010, Chris Stockton wrote:
My biggest issue as a user is the fatal errors. Why are we blowing
up on something that should throw some kind of useful argument
exception? I end up in my applications using instanceof everywhere
because thei
At 20:28 29/05/2010, Chris Stockton wrote:
My biggest issue as a user is the fatal errors. Why are we blowing
up on something that should throw some kind of useful argument
exception? I end up in my applications using instanceof everywhere
because their is important cleanup to be done before t
My biggest issue as a user is the fatal errors. Why are we blowing up on
something that should throw some kind of useful argument exception? I end up
in my applications using instanceof everywhere because their is important
cleanup to be done before the end of the request. For example I can't affor
At 11:33 29/05/2010, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
The "optional scalar type hinting" [snip]
Sebastian,
I understand why proponents of strict typing are putting 'optional'
next to it to suggest that people don't have to use it, ergo those
who don't intend to use it shouldn't care. As numerous
Hey,
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
> ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
> doing manually).
Having the file is absolutely fine with me, while I can fulfill my needs
with svn
2010/5/29 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
>> ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
>> doing manually).
>
> Having the file is absolutely fine with m
hi Gwynne,
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Gwynne Raskind
wrote:
>> By "without doing it manually", I meant when one fetches a release or
>> a snapshot.
>
>
> The ChangeLog files aren't updated because no one ever ported the ChangeLog
> crons from CVS to SVN. It wouldn't be very difficult - i
On May 28, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
outdated file might be confusing for
Am 28.05.2010 20:07, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
> On top of that, your boilerplate throws exception. Strict typing would
> error out. That's very different thing (exceptions can be handled
> hierarchically, errors can't). So replacing that with strict type
> probably won't do the same.
The "optional
10 matches
Mail list logo
