+1 For derick and Kalle
2010/4/27 Kalle Sommer Nielsen :
> Hi
>
> 2010/3/24 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
>> Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite
>> committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he
>> feels he needs support he can propose a co-RM
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is hardly un-google-able.
If users have to Google it, we've already failed ;)
By the way, the Hebrew name was (at some point) for removal, to be fully
replaced by its alias T_DOUBLE_COLON. With the PHP6 branch being scrapped I
lost track of what happened.
Regards,
Sta
>-Original Message-
>From: Davey Shafik [mailto:da...@php.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:03 AM
>To: mathieu.suen
>Cc: Hannes Magnusson; PHP internals
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Obscure token name
>
>
>From the manual:
>
>T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :: ::. Also defined as T_DOUBLE_COLON
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 10:17 +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> it looks like the fact that ArrayAccess::offsetGet is not returning a
> reference is a recurrent problem, I see basically 4 options:
The main use case is some nested structure like
$o = new ArrayObject();
/*...*/
$o[23][42] = "foobar
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:46 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> Before even thinking about a planning, we have to define what we want
> in and how we go further.
ACK, I think it makes sense to define some "key features" we want for
the next release (traits seem to be one). An issue with 5.3 was that
whene
Before even thinking about a planning, we have to define what we want
in and how we go further.
That being said, my vote remains the same as before.
Cheers,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> +1 for Derick and Kalle, and +1 for alpha by Q4.
>
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:53 AM,
+1 for Derick and Kalle, and +1 for alpha by Q4.
On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> +1 for a co-RM of Derick and Kalle
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> 2010/3/24 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
>>> Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has ste
You can pry T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM from my cold dead fingers!
On 4/27/10, mathieu.suen wrote:
> OMG More than 100 token
> I am pretty sure that more than 50% are syntactic sugar.
>
>
>
>
> Davey Shafik wrote:
>> From the manual:
>>
>> T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :: ::. Also defined as T_DOU
OMG More than 100 token
I am pretty sure that more than 50% are syntactic sugar.
Davey Shafik wrote:
From the manual:
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :: ::. Also defined as T_DOUBLE_COLON.
http://php.net/manual/en/tokens.php
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is hardly un-google-able.
- Davey
On Apr 27
Stefan Marr wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 08:50, mathieu.suen wrote:
Then T_DOUBLE_COLON would have been perfectly clear.
Honestly, token names in error messages is so '80s.
Instead of fixing internal details, form the users point of view it might be better to not expose token names at all,
From the manual:
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :: ::. Also defined as T_DOUBLE_COLON.
http://php.net/manual/en/tokens.php
T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is hardly un-google-able.
- Davey
On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:50 AM, mathieu.suen wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 16:32, mathie
+1 for a co-RM of Derick and Kalle
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2010/3/24 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
> > Yeah, lets get that clarified. Derick has stepped up and seems quite
> committed and nobody seemed to oppose him RMing the next release. In case he
> feels h
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:51, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 27 April 2010 09:17, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it looks like the fact that ArrayAccess::offsetGet is not returning a
>> reference is a recurrent problem, I see basically 4 options:
>>
>> a) Ignore the issue, change nothing
>>
>> b)
On 27 April 2010 09:17, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks like the fact that ArrayAccess::offsetGet is not returning a
> reference is a recurrent problem, I see basically 4 options:
>
> a) Ignore the issue, change nothing
>
> b) Rewrite offsetGet to return a ref, breaking BC
-1,000,000
>
>
Hi,
it looks like the fact that ArrayAccess::offsetGet is not returning a
reference is a recurrent problem, I see basically 4 options:
a) Ignore the issue, change nothing
b) Rewrite offsetGet to return a ref, breaking BC
c) Create a new ArrayAccess interface where it does return a ref
d) Relax
Am 27.04.2010 09:17, schrieb Stefan Marr:
> Instead of fixing internal details, form the users point of view it
> might be better to not expose token names at all, but have meaningful
> parser errors.
... which we want to achieve with the migration from bison to lemon,
right?
--
Sebastian Ber
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:53, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> kalle Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:53:30 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=298625
>
> Log:
> Removed safe_mode
> * Removed ini options, safe_mode*
> * Removed --enable-safe-m
On 27 Apr 2010, at 08:50, mathieu.suen wrote:
> Then T_DOUBLE_COLON would have been perfectly clear.
Honestly, token names in error messages is so '80s.
Instead of fixing internal details, form the users point of view it might be
better to not expose token names at all, but have meaningful parser
18 matches
Mail list logo
