On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:36 AM, GM wrote:
> Hey guys. I'm glad to be on the internals list -- I just signed up. I've been
> a PHP developer for many years, and I have a couple ideas that might make PHP
> 6 better. Is this a good forum to bring up proposals of that kind?
Greetings Gregory,
Writin
Hey guys. I'm glad to be on the internals list -- I just signed up.
I've been a PHP developer for many years, and I have a couple ideas
that might make PHP 6 better. Is this a good forum to bring up
proposals of that kind?
Sincerely,
Greg Magarshak
PS: By the way, I'm wondering what the pr
2010/3/29 Jérôme Loyet :
> Le 29 mars 2010 13:11, Pierre Joye a écrit :
>> hi,
>>
>> I would suggest to call it fpm.configuration_path if it looks for the
>> file it self there, or fpm.configuration_dir if it looks in this path
>> for the conf file(s), that's actually explicit :)
>
> as discuss wi
Le 29 mars 2010 13:11, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> hi,
>
> I would suggest to call it fpm.configuration_path if it looks for the
> file it self there, or fpm.configuration_dir if it looks in this path
> for the conf file(s), that's actually explicit :)
as discuss with tony, I changed that to fpm.conf
hi,
I would suggest to call it fpm.configuration_path if it looks for the
file it self there, or fpm.configuration_dir if it looks in this path
for the conf file(s), that's actually explicit :)
Cheers,
2010/3/29 Jérôme Loyet :
> fat Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:45:28
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
IMHO __get is not consistent at the first place.
on possible example:
It is perfectly consistent. You just need to read what it actually does:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php#language.oop5.overloading.members
instead of imagining wh
