yep nevermind I don't you post this question on php-internal and don't
understand this ugly suggestion, Brian when I read your cv it seems to
be something serious ... when I see the line with your type recasting
I am not sure you understood something during these 15 years.
Best
On Sat, Jan 16, 2
Never use empty()
I've been burned by this too many times.
It's behaviour around '0' and friends changed over the years.
Some colleagues at a former job looked at me funny when they first
heard my rant about this. Then they tracked down 3 separate bugs and
fixed them, all deriving from the use
Try this instead:
request_rec *r = (request_rec *)(((SG(server_context) == NULL) ? NULL :
((php_struct*)SG(server_context))->r));
Apache 2.x server_context is not a request_rec, it is a struct with a request
rec in it.
Brian
On Jan 16, 2010, at 7:25 PM, rwe rt wrote:
> Hi all,I compiled php
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Can you tell me what exactly we are breaking? divert calls should only be
> used internally by autoconf and the, apparently useless, usage of them in
> php makes it fail to build with any other autoconf.
Have a look in the archives. I tried getting the divert stuff wor
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> 16.1.2010 20:10, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Some of the other patches include:
>> libdb_is_-ldb
>
> Why? Potentially breaks things when you assume db/ being correct place..
Do you have an example of any actual case?
>
>> 115-autoconf_ftbfs.patch
>
> Hell no. You're brea
Hi all,I compiled php-5.3.1 with apache 2.2.14 as DSO and wanted to test how to
call Apache API from a PHP module:Run ./ext_skel --extname=helloModified
ext/hello.c and the function PHP_FUNCTION(confirm_hello_compiled) so that it
contains
#include "SAPI.h"
#include "httpd.h"
#include "http_conf
17.1.2010 0:29, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 17.01.2010, at 1:05, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
115-autoconf_ftbfs.patch
Hell no. You're breaking the configure again with this crap. I already reverted
the idiocy once, don't even think about doing thi
On 17.01.2010, at 1:05, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>> 115-autoconf_ftbfs.patch
>> Hell no. You're breaking the configure again with this crap. I already
>> reverted the idiocy once, don't even think about doing this shit again. PHP
>> configure wo
On Jan 16, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>> 115-autoconf_ftbfs.patch
> Hell no. You're breaking the configure again with this crap. I already
> reverted the idiocy once, don't even think about doing this shit again. PHP
> configure works properly only with autoconf-2.13 which was the las
16.1.2010 20:10, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Some of the other patches include:
libdb_is_-ldb
Why? Potentially breaks things when you assume db/ being correct place..
115-autoconf_ftbfs.patch
Hell no. You're breaking the configure again with this crap. I already reverted
the idiocy once, don't
Johannes,
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Raphael,
>
> I went over your patches from
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/php5/5.3.1-2 and did quick
> reviews (didn't apply / test them or anything ...)
Although I would have preferred you wait for me to submit each patch
individually with enoug
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/13 Derick Rethans :
>>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Would it be possible to force short_open_tag to a specific value for
>>> those applications alone? Perhaps through an .htaccess file? That way,
>>> Deb
Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> 2010/1/13 Derick Rethans :
>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Would it be possible to force short_open_tag to a specific value for
>> those applications alone? Perhaps through an .htaccess file? That way,
>> Debian keeps the "PHP default" but
Raphael,
I went over your patches from
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/php5/5.3.1-2 and did quick
reviews (didn't apply / test them or anything ...)
Here some comments:
004-ldap_fix.patch:
Do you have a test for this? when does it happen that ldap_value is
NULL happen? - If that's an
Hello,
I tried to compile PHP-GTK 2.0.1 with PHP 5.3.1 on Windows.
The first errors I was able to fix. The patch file with my fixes you find as
an attachment to this mail.
But now I get following error and I don't know why. VC9 doesn't find the
SG-definition, but SAPI.h is included in php_gtk+.c.
Hi.
On 16.01.10 02:54, Matt Read wrote:
> We are developers from the Habari Project, an open source PHP blogging
> application; We would like to raise concern with a recent change to the
> logic of PDO.
I fully support what Matt writes. Although we don't use that behaviour
in our codebase, the wa
16 matches
Mail list logo
