Hi Pierre
Thanks for the tip. It works now. Both working and no-working box are
Windows Vista 32 and both have Apache/2.2.13 (Win32) from apachelounge.com.
There was some change since september 27th because both boxes are equal:
same OS, same Apache and same Mysql version (5.1.40-community).
T
hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:57 PM, holografix wrote:
> Hi
> Thanks for answering. Same problem with
> php-5.3.2-dev-nts-Win32-VC9-x86-200910281000. Forgot to say that in another
> windows box there is a snapshot from September 27th and it is working
> without problems.
Please try again with c
Hi
Thanks for answering. Same problem with
php-5.3.2-dev-nts-Win32-VC9-x86-200910281000. Forgot to say that in another
windows box there is a snapshot from September 27th and it is working
without problems.
From phpinfo() in that box
Build Date Sep 27 2009 01:57:01
Compiler MSVC9 (Visual C+
hi,
Can you try a snaps from yesterday please? But I doubt this fix affects windows.
http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/
Cheers,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:06 PM, holo wrote:
> Hi
> Don´t know if it is a bug but latest Windows snapshot fails to connect to
> mysql. pdo_mysql gives SQLSTATE[H
Hi
Don´t know if it is a bug but latest Windows snapshot fails to connect to
mysql. pdo_mysql gives SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] and even a simple
mysql_connect("host", "user", "pass") fails with error [2002] (trying to
connect via tcp://localhost:3306
Maybe it is related with bug #50023 ?
Didn't try
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2009 à 17:37 +0100, Patrick ALLAERT a écrit :
> Yes, but as far as a PHP extension may take hundreds time to develop
> than a PHP function.
> If the PHP version is fast enough, you will win a huge amount of time,
> if not, you will only lose less than 1% of the overall dev time.
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2009 à 17:35 +0100, Patrick ALLAERT a écrit :
> 2009/10/29 Samuel ROZE :
> > Le jeudi 29 octobre 2009 à 14:03 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin a écrit :
> >> Usually, it is a good idea to write it in PHP at first and then port
> >> to C, if performance is poor
> >
> > But I lose some ti
2009/10/29 Samuel ROZE :
> Le jeudi 29 octobre 2009 à 14:03 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin a écrit :
>> Usually, it is a good idea to write it in PHP at first and then port
>> to C, if performance is poor
>
> But I lose some time !
(Reposting with ML included.)
Yes, but as far as a PHP extension may ta
Le jeudi 29 octobre 2009 à 14:03 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin a écrit :
> Usually, it is a good idea to write it in PHP at first and then port
> to C, if performance is poor
But I lose some time !
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un
On 29.10.2009, at 12:34, Samuel ROZE wrote:
Hi,
I'll have to develop a function like "parse_url", but "parse_referrer"
which provides informations about the URL (the referrer): provider,
keywords, type of search (search, cache, translation, ...), real page
url...
I don't really know how I'll
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Samuel ROZE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll have to develop a function like "parse_url", but "parse_referrer"
> which provides informations about the URL (the referrer): provider,
> keywords, type of search (search, cache, translation, ...), real page
> url...
>
> I don't r
Hi,
I'll have to develop a function like "parse_url", but "parse_referrer"
which provides informations about the URL (the referrer): provider,
keywords, type of search (search, cache, translation, ...), real page
url...
I don't really know how I'll do that: using a .ini file like
"get_browser" ?
Hi.
On 26.10.09 15:25, Mathieu Suen wrote:
> I am more asking about performance.
I would have been ready to sacrifice performance if it saved money. But
according to my quick tests, it does not. See http://tr.im/DrsH for
details... oh, this is on PHP 5.3.
Any other insights on this welcome!
Reg
13 matches
Mail list logo
