Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.11 Released!

2009-09-18 Thread Adam Harvey
2009/9/19 Carsten Wiedmann > > Kalle Sommer Nielsen schrieb: > > 2009/9/19 Carsten Wiedmann : > >> So that's the next PHP release with a broken IPv6 support (after 5.2.10 and > >> 5.3.0) and so it's not possible to update for some peoples. > > > > Is there a bug # on this so its not some unknown i

Re: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread Chris Trahey
Hey all, thanks for the discussion. First, in terms of implimentation, I've gone back and forth between a few ways to expose it, but it struck me tonight that the most similar keyword in use currently is $this. Next to that I think would be static. But it seems like there is a bigger decisi

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.11 Released!

2009-09-18 Thread Carsten Wiedmann
Kalle Sommer Nielsen schrieb: > 2009/9/19 Carsten Wiedmann : >> So that's the next PHP release with a broken IPv6 support (after 5.2.10 and >> 5.3.0) and so it's not possible to update for some peoples. > > Is there a bug # on this so its not some unknown issue we suddenly > have to know about? S

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.11 Released!

2009-09-18 Thread Kalle Sommer Nielsen
2009/9/19 Carsten Wiedmann : > So that's the next PHP release with a broken IPv6 support (after 5.2.10 and > 5.3.0) and so it's not possible to update for some peoples. Is there a bug # on this so its not some unknown issue we suddenly have to know about? -- regrads, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.11 Released!

2009-09-18 Thread Carsten Wiedmann
Ilia Alshanetsky schrieb: > The PHP development team would like to announce the immediate > availability of PHP 5.2.11. ... All users of PHP 5.2 are encouraged to > upgrade to this release. So that's the next PHP release with a broken IPv6 support (after 5.2.10 and 5.3.0) and so it's not possible

Re: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread Larry Garfield
On Friday 18 September 2009 9:12:55 am troels knak-nielsen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Ford, Mike wrote: > > Well, that sounds like a pretty good definition of a "magic" constant, so > > maybe __CALLER__ might be appropriate as well? > > It's not a constant, is it now? > > __FILE__,

Re: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread troels knak-nielsen
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Ford, Mike wrote: > Well, that sounds like a pretty good definition of a "magic" constant, so > maybe __CALLER__ might be appropriate as well? It's not a constant, is it now? __FILE__, __LINE__, __CLASS__ etc. can be resolved at compile-time. The caller will onl

Re: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread Richard Quadling
2009/9/18 Ford, Mike : >> -Original Message- >> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:rquadl...@googlemail.com] >> Sent: 18 September 2009 10:43 > >> >> Considering we have func_get_args(), maybe func_get_caller() would >> be >> a nice fit. >> >> I don't like the idea of a constant (CALLER) which

RE: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread Ford, Mike
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Quadling [mailto:rquadl...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 18 September 2009 10:43 > > Considering we have func_get_args(), maybe func_get_caller() would > be > a nice fit. > > I don't like the idea of a constant (CALLER) which changes value as > you move aro

Re: [PHP-DEV] reference caller object

2009-09-18 Thread Richard Quadling
2009/9/17 Sebastian Bergmann : > Chris Trahey schrieb: >> using it is current-implimentation specific (i.e. developer needs to >> know the format of the array returned) > >  And adding another language feature is not something the developer needs >  to know? > > -- > Sebastian Bergmann