Hello Robin,
Thanks for your reply :-)
The behaviour of "static fields are shared between subclasses" is exactly
what I would like to question, since PHP is not a so called "static
programming language" like C++, Java and C#. Currently PHP's object model is
designed and implemented as class-based
>From what I know, in the future versions of PHP short tags are going to be
disabled by default. Considering the conflicts with XML syntax, that's
understandable. However, is there a technical reason to consider "<%="|"value.str.val = yytext; /* no copying - intentional */
zendlval->value.str.len
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Michael Shadle wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Christian Schneider
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There's a big difference between changing some rare features (and no,
>>> 5.3 needs - almost no to - no changes with the code bases I know) and
>>> removing something *everybody* u
Michael Shadle wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
There's a big difference between changing some rare features (and no,
5.3 needs - almost no to - no changes with the code bases I know) and
removing something *everybody* uses.
Apart from the fact that _REQUEST
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
> There's a big difference between changing some rare features (and no,
> 5.3 needs - almost no to - no changes with the code bases I know) and
> removing something *everybody* uses.
>
> Apart from the fact that _REQUEST is not evil per
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 12:58 +0200, Sahid Ferdjaoui wrote:
> Yes, why not :)
>
> By get involved section,
> i seek a guideline for contribute for each different points.
>
> * Internal development
> * References
> * TSRM
> * Zend Engine API
> * ...
Some documentation on this exists i
2009/5/16 Jingcheng Zhang :
>
> Maybe I have not found its detailed description on PHP's official manual,
> but PHP does allow static field inheritance. However there is a little
> difference between dynamic field inheritance and static field inheritance,
> as the following codes shows:
Hi!
I thi
Michael Shadle wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
> wrote:
>
>> Confusing new code is totally different from breaking existing code.
>
> True but aren't some changes in 6.0 at least (and possibly 5.3) going
> to require code changes? Or is it still going to be "legacy e
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/
Num Status Summary (77 total -- which includes 36 feature requests)
===[*Unicode Issues]==
48265 Open Source and result of database have different encodings.
==
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/
Num Status Summary (1320 total -- which includes 858 feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
48300 Feedback crash in zif_file_put_contents
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Tim Starling kirjoitti:
>> The readline extension links both libreadline and libhistory. This is
>> unnecessary, and inspection of the readline example programs since
>> version 2.0 implies that it has always been unnecessary. Both libraries
>> include history.o, so linking t
11 matches
Mail list logo