Hi Matteo
2009/4/1 Matteo Beccati :
> Hi,
>
>> After a quick discussion with Lukas and Antony on IRC, I wrote a small
>> script to detect how many functions/methods are returning false after
>> failing to validate the arguments: you 'll find the result for PHP_5_3
>> attached.
>>
>> The regex I've
Hello everyone,
I'd like to propose a very small update, which would have no
backwards-compatibility problems, and would bring PHP closer to
standards compliance.
The update I'd like to propose is to the Zend Highlighter for PHP,
specifically related to the highlight_file and highlight_string
fun
Hi,
After a quick discussion with Lukas and Antony on IRC, I wrote a small
script to detect how many functions/methods are returning false after
failing to validate the arguments: you 'll find the result for PHP_5_3
attached.
The regex I've used is not perfect, but if you think it's somewhat
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 16:16 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
> I think that to handle more complex cases we need the kind of
> information which makes it straightforward to easily generate code to
> make a seamless interface between C and the engine API. The only case
> I had thought of was to someho
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> This is something I have considered in the past esp. as it would also reduce
> dependency of extensions on PHP runtime and make it easier for 3rd parties to
> distribute PHP extensions which don't have to be rebuilt per-PHP versi
2009/4/1 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:24 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
>> > Moreover, in your example in the wiki you don't include how you would do
>> > parameter parsing. Or do you rely on the code generator to look at the C
>> > functions signatures and figure out by itself
Hi Paul,
This is something I have considered in the past esp. as it would also reduce
dependency of extensions on PHP runtime and make it easier for 3rd parties to
distribute PHP extensions which don't have to be rebuilt per-PHP version. This
is similar to JNI.
There are some real challenges t
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:24 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
> > Moreover, in your example in the wiki you don't include how you would do
> > parameter parsing. Or do you rely on the code generator to look at the C
> > functions signatures and figure out by itself what to do? (actually there is
> > s
2009/4/1 Richard Quadling :
> 2009/4/1 Pierre Joye :
>> check the snapshot.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Richard Quadling
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/3/31 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
On 28.03.2009, at 16:45, Ionut G. Stan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing with 5.3.0 RC1 and wanted t
Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a way to implement in some future release of PHP (without
> hurting performance), but it's not in the scope of 5.3.
>
> Each namespace should have a meta file listing all symbols present in
> it. The parser loads that static file at parse time and r
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Hi Paul et all,
>
> I fully understand (and even share) your motivations and goals. However it
> seems to me that describing an extension in PHP will lead to loss of
> performance, as you cannot capture certain C features in PHP. For example,
>
2009/4/1 Pierre Joye :
> check the snapshot.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> 2009/3/31 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
>>>
>>> On 28.03.2009, at 16:45, Ionut G. Stan wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I'm playing with 5.3.0 RC1 and wanted to install PEAR. In the previous
vers
Hi,
There is a way to implement in some future release of PHP (without hurting
performance), but it's not in the scope of 5.3.
Each namespace should have a meta file listing all symbols present in it.
The parser loads that static file at parse time and resolves all naming at
parse time, lea
check the snapshot.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
>>
>> On 28.03.2009, at 16:45, Ionut G. Stan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm playing with 5.3.0 RC1 and wanted to install PEAR. In the previous
>>> versions (for Windows at least)
>>> there
2009/3/31 Lukas Kahwe Smith :
>
> On 28.03.2009, at 16:45, Ionut G. Stan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm playing with 5.3.0 RC1 and wanted to install PEAR. In the previous
>> versions (for Windows at least)
>> there was a go-pear executable which is missing now. So what are the plans
>> for supporting PE
Derick Rethans schrieb:
> I don't know what the state is tbh, but there is now also "webgrind" at
> http://code.google.com/p/webgrind/
There is also Carica Cachegrind (http://ccg.sourceforge.net/).
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://sebastian-be
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
> On 31.03.2009 18:08 Uhr, David Coallier wrote:
> > I'm sorry to tell you that but xdebug web profiling was a project for
> > last year. Please read http://wiki.php.net/gsoc/2009 for this years
> > GSoC ideas.
>
> Well, was it done last year? If yes:
Hi.
On 31.03.2009 18:08 Uhr, David Coallier wrote:
I'm sorry to tell you that but xdebug web profiling was a project for
last year. Please read http://wiki.php.net/gsoc/2009 for this years
GSoC ideas.
Well, was it done last year? If yes: great, where is it? If no: yeah, do
it this year!
Reg
18 matches
Mail list logo
