Pierre Joye wrote:
The new parsing API and the strictness of this "return NULL" rule is
new and arguable. As it is not that important (work 'round is easy), I
tend to prefer to minimize the wtf instead of being too strict.
This "new parsing API" is not so new, dammit. :) It's a few years old by
Hi Matt,
I ran you version but it looked little bit slower (I checked it with
callgrind). So I kept the current CVS version. Anyway, it is not a big
problem to change it after RC.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Matt Wilmas wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitry Stogov"
Sent: Thursda
On 20.03.2009, at 12:37, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith >wrote:
Hello,
We are not in a commit freeze on the 5_3 branch. For today for any
commit
not just affecting README's (as in anything affecting buolding or
build
testing), please get a nod fr
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are not in a commit freeze on the 5_3 branch. For today for any commit
> not just affecting README's (as in anything affecting buolding or build
> testing), please get a nod from Johannes or myself. On the weekend and
> Mon
Hello,
We are not in a commit freeze on the 5_3 branch. For today for any
commit not just affecting README's (as in anything affecting buolding
or build testing), please get a nod from Johannes or myself. On the
weekend and Monday only build related fixes are allowed in the 5_3
branch. Pl