Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Tim Starling
Kenan Sulayman wrote: > Hello PHP internals, > > I've been running several million tests regarding the > arithmetically-random-functions. > > The returning value at the end: > Avg: mt_r: 1073848211.4106 r: 16384.155746685 ~8016909 > Avg: mt_r: 1073904131.0286 r: 16384.164383921 ~8503575 > Avg: mt_r

[PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/standard/tests/general_functions phpinfo.phpt

2009-03-04 Thread Greg Beaver
zoe wrote: > >> Hi Zoe, >> >> Is there documentation on this change? > Hi Greg - you mean the change I made to the phpinfo.phpt test? If so I > changed it because it was failing and should not have been. Or do you > mean changes to run-tests.php options? I meant to run-tests.php. >> I'm finding i

[PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/standard/tests/general_functions phpinfo.phpt

2009-03-04 Thread zoe
Hi Zoe, Is there documentation on this change? Hi Greg - you mean the change I made to the phpinfo.phpt test? If so I changed it because it was failing and should not have been. Or do you mean changes to run-tests.php options? I'm finding it a little bit arbitrary that run-tests keeps chan

[PHP-DEV] Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/standard/tests/general_functions phpinfo.phpt

2009-03-04 Thread Greg Beaver
Zoe Slattery wrote: > zoe Wed Mar 4 10:23:01 2009 UTC > > Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3) > /php-src/ext/standard/tests/general_functions phpinfo.phpt > Log: > fixed test > > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/tests/general_functions/phpi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Should windows builds of PHP have the https protocol registered?

2009-03-04 Thread Richard Quadling
2009/3/4 Pierre Joye : > hi, > > It is, via openssl. > > php -d extension_dir=ext -dextension=php_openssl.dll -r "print_r(stream_get > _wrappers());" > Array > ( >    [0] => php >    [1] => file >    [2] => glob >    [3] => data >    [4] => http >    [5] => ftp >    [6] => zip >    [7] => compress.

Re: [PHP-DEV] Should windows builds of PHP have the https protocol registered?

2009-03-04 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, It is, via openssl. php -d extension_dir=ext -dextension=php_openssl.dll -r "print_r(stream_get _wrappers());" Array ( [0] => php [1] => file [2] => glob [3] => data [4] => http [5] => ftp [6] => zip [7] => compress.zlib [8] => https [9] => ftps [10

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Kenan Sulayman
Guess you're right ;-D Thanks! -- (c) Kenan Sulayman Freelance Designer and Programmer Life's Live Poetry 2009/3/4 Stefan Walk > > On 4 Mar 2009, at 15:46, Kenan Sulayman wrote: > > Hey Pierre! >> >> Didn't I included the mt_rand function in my tests ? >> >> Quote: "Average of mersenne twis

[PHP-DEV] Should windows builds of PHP have the https protocol registered?

2009-03-04 Thread Richard Quadling
Hi. Running PHP Version 5.3.0beta2-dev on Windows Registered PHP Streams php, file, glob, data, http, ftp, zip, compress.zlib, phar As such, I can't use https. Except for curl. Is that normal? -- - Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=21347473

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Stefan Walk
On 4 Mar 2009, at 15:46, Kenan Sulayman wrote: Hey Pierre! Didn't I included the mt_rand function in my tests ? Quote: "Average of mersenne twister in 8016909 it's is 1073848211.4106 ( corresponding to that in 8503575 it's the avg. is 1073904131.0286)." The mail was meant to make the rand

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Kenan Sulayman wrote: The rand(x) function alters the avg in 5M iterations really by just 0.1 ? Wow, that's creepy. Is there any way - to make it better ( or a bit as good as the m_twister is ? ) ? there's a reason why mt_rand() is referred to as "Generate a better random value" in the rand()

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Kenan Sulayman
Hey Pierre! Didn't I included the mt_rand function in my tests ? Quote: "Average of mersenne twister in 8016909 it's is 1073848211.4106 ( corresponding to that in 8503575 it's the avg. is 1073904131.0286)." The mail was meant to make the rand(x) function more good; I already use the mt_rand() fu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, And please disable this auto reply on your system: "Der Server hat ihre Nachricht erfolgreich verarbeitet! Vielen Dank, Ihr KurealCorporation Kunden Service." Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Kenan Sulayman wrote: > I've been running several million tests regarding the > arithmetically-random-functions. > > The returning value at the end: > Avg: mt_r: 1073848211.4106 r: 16384.155746685 ~8016909 > Avg: mt_r: 1073904131.0286 r: 16384.164383921 ~85035

[PHP-DEV] Really random ?

2009-03-04 Thread Kenan Sulayman
Hello PHP internals, I've been running several million tests regarding the arithmetically-random-functions. The returning value at the end: Avg: mt_r: 1073848211.4106 r: 16384.155746685 ~8016909 Avg: mt_r: 1073904131.0286 r: 16384.164383921 ~8503575 Avg: mt_r: 1074010520.4456 r: 16384.091213092 ~

Re: [PHP-DEV] How expensive are function_exists() calls?

2009-03-04 Thread Kenan Sulayman
Update: Reached: Average: 1.3338460335041E-5 seconds / 817542. Shape: Average: ( $seconds ) seconds / ( $iterations ). -- (c) Kenan Sulayman Freelance Designer and Programmer Life's Live Poetry 2009/3/4 Kenan Sulayman > Hello Mike! > > Depending on how you'd define expensive, it may variate.

Re: [PHP-DEV] How expensive are function_exists() calls?

2009-03-04 Thread Mikko Koppanen
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Kenan Sulayman wrote: > Hello Mike! > > Depending on how you'd define expensive, it may variate. > Normally, on websites function_exists(x) ain't expensive. > > Altrought function_exists needed 0.77009201049805 seconds to execute. > Do you think, that's pretty e

Re: [PHP-DEV] How expensive are function_exists() calls?

2009-03-04 Thread Kenan Sulayman
Hello Mike! Depending on how you'd define expensive, it may variate. Normally, on websites function_exists(x) ain't expensive. Altrought function_exists needed 0.77009201049805 seconds to execute. Do you think, that's pretty expensive ? Your, -- (c) Kenan Sulayman Freelance Designer and Prog

Re: [PHP-DEV] Are there plans to allow anonymous functions as callbacks?

2009-03-04 Thread Richard Quadling
2009/3/4 Olivier B. : > > Alexey Zakhlestin a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Richard Quadling >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Quite a simple question (assuming I've got the terminology correct). >>> >>> Are there any plans to allow code like this (amended example taken >>> from the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Are there plans to allow anonymous functions as callbacks?

2009-03-04 Thread Olivier B.
Alexey Zakhlestin a écrit : On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: Hi. Quite a simple question (assuming I've got the terminology correct). Are there any plans to allow code like this (amended example taken from the array_map() documentation) ... It works. You hav

Re: [PHP-DEV] Are there plans to allow anonymous functions as callbacks?

2009-03-04 Thread Ionut G. Stan
You need PHP 5.3 for that. Here's the RFC: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures On 3/4/2009 13:33, Richard Quadling wrote: Hi. Quite a simple question (assuming I've got the terminology correct). Are there any plans to allow code like this (amended example taken from the array_map() documentatio

Re: [PHP-DEV] Are there plans to allow anonymous functions as callbacks?

2009-03-04 Thread Alexey Zakhlestin
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: > Hi. > > Quite a simple question (assuming I've got the terminology correct). > > Are there any plans to allow code like this (amended example taken > from the array_map() documentation) ... > > $a = array(1, 2, 3, 4, 5); > $b = array_map(f

[PHP-DEV] Are there plans to allow anonymous functions as callbacks?

2009-03-04 Thread Richard Quadling
Hi. Quite a simple question (assuming I've got the terminology correct). Are there any plans to allow code like this (amended example taken from the array_map() documentation) ... http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" -- PHP In

[PHP-DEV] How expensive are function_exists() calls?

2009-03-04 Thread mike
I am trying to figure out a strategy for multiple output formats on a site, and it seems like I can have functions defined by default, but have them defined -after- I've included the targetted format first. However that would require file1.php: function foo() {} file2.php if(!function_exists('