Especially in namespaced code it should be very useful to have
"something" returning fully qualified name as string. It can be operator,
but I think introducing new keyword is bad way, or it can be realized
using well known magic constant in new context:
Example:
function factory($class)
hi pierre
sorry, was already asleep when you came looking for me on IRC :)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:25:21PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> it is fixed in 5.2.7RC2 or RC3, see:
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/zip/php_zip.c?r1=1.1.2.43&r2=1.1.2.44
FSVO "fixed" that includes segfaulting,
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 2:19:53 pm Greg Beaver wrote:
> [Drawbacks]
> 1) requires changing the engine near beta
Legitimate concern, but I happily defer t the maintainers here.
> 2) adds new syntax to namespaces
If I'm reading the RFC properly, it extends the existing syntax in a logical
w
Having ascertained that Lukas did not shoot himself on seeing this...
This is a "testing of the waters" RFC. If there is interest, it will be
followed with a patch. It should be noted that the patch for this has
been available through the various vortexes of namespace syntax for over
a year no
re,
I ran a quick test to solve this problem sooner rather than later
(using only the crash.zip part):
pie...@ubuntu:~/cvs/php53/bld$ ./sapi/cli/php ./ziptest.php
opening 'bad' zipfile...ok.
extracted.
C:\Users\pierre\Documents\php-sdk\php53\vc9\x86\php53clean>Debug\php.exe
ziptest.php
opening
Scott MacVicar wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> It's almost that time again where we rush at the last minute to organise
> something for the Google Summer of Code, so in the interest of being
> prepared I'm thinking it's time to start collecting ideas for potential
> students. I've updated a few of the
hi,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:57 PM, sean finney wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> i'm looking for a sanity check here, as i've already lost more time than
> i'd like chasing ghosts on my treasure hunt through {bugs,lists,cvs}.php.net
> :(
>
> afaict, CVE-2008-5658[1] is only half-fixed on 5.2.8, while
Hi Everybody,
It's almost that time again where we rush at the last minute to
organise something for the Google Summer of Code, so in the interest
of being prepared I'm thinking it's time to start collecting ideas for
potential students. I've updated a few of the Wiki pages with some
thin
hi everyone,
i'm looking for a sanity check here, as i've already lost more time than
i'd like chasing ghosts on my treasure hunt through {bugs,lists,cvs}.php.net :(
afaict, CVE-2008-5658[1] is only half-fixed on 5.2.8, while it was supposed
to be fixed in 5.2.7.
while the zip library no longe
Hey!
First of all: the idea is very good.
Criticism: Again, that's a new Syntax "feature";
May we deploy this into next releases of PHP?
Thanks!
--
(c) Kenan Sulayman
Freelance Designer and Programmer
Life's Live Poetry
2009/1/21 David Grudl
> Especially in namespaced code it should be very
Especially in namespaced code it should be very useful to have
"something" returning fully qualified name as string. It can be
operator, but I think introducing new keyword is bad way, or it can be
realized using well known magic constant in new context:
Example:
function factory($class)
{
This is a "testing of the waters" RFC. If there is interest, it will be
followed with a patch. It should be noted that the patch for this has
been available through the various vortexes of namespace syntax for over
a year now, and it is an extremely simple patch.
[RFC]
Implement importing of fun
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Personally I like the current syntax more and don't see any reason to
> change it.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Hello Internals, Dmitry, Lukas, Johannes,
>>
>> some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
>> position and not at
Roman Borschel schrieb:
> Would you mind sharing (off-list) how you get data in and out of the
> objects **transparently**
Have a look at lp:php-object-freezer.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 686
My personal favorite use of Reflection is Class Factories. While this
could be done with:
It seems a little blunt to me, it also doesn't support having a
variable number of arguments to the constructor. I've seen some
pretty egregious hacks to make the above code work with a variable
number of
On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in
php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
Reflecti
Christian Schneider wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
Reflection (or even other fancy features
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
> stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
Reflection (or even other fancy features not yet in PHP) for this.
First: I'd understand, I've to build the caching system on my own;
Second: I'd vote for speeding up Reflection.
Thanks,
--
(c) Kenan Sulayman
Freelance Designer and Programmer
Life's Live Poetry
2009/1/21 Nathan Rixham
> Christian Schneider wrote:
>
>> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On 21.01.
Christian Schneider wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it f
Christian Schneider schrieb:
> Yes, please. Keep clutter out of the engine especially for stuff which
> should not be used often. If you are relying on Reflection to be fast
> for you everyday code then you're IMHO doing something weird and it is
> ok that you have to write your own caching for it
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
>
>> On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
>>> I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
>>> quite
>>> expensive;
>>
>> Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3
On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
Hi.
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is
to create a ReflectionService t
Hi.
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is to
create a ReflectionService that caches such information as long as the
source doesn'
Thanks,
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is quite
expensive;
Actually tests showed: the user-land algorithm of mapping these objects
(regarding a count of thousand; up to a half million objects / iterations)
took 0,2 - 70 seconds to execute!
Therefore: I would be v
setAcessible() is the way to go!
Doctrine 2.0 took advantage of it to be able to move to a completely
VO mapping of models. =)
Cheers,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
wrote:
> Etienne Kneuss schrieb:
>> Why can't you use Reflection in this case? It looks like you can quite
>
On 21.01.2009, at 10:04, David Zülke wrote:
Am 20.01.2009 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Seiler:
Hi,
maybe an IRC meeting is the easiest way to come to an agreement. How
about tomorrow evening 21:00 CEST in #php.closures on freenode?
Just for clarification: I assume you mean Wednesday, Januar
Am 20.01.2009 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Seiler:
Hi,
maybe an IRC meeting is the easiest way to come to an agreement. How
about tomorrow evening 21:00 CEST in #php.closures on freenode?
Just for clarification: I assume you mean Wednesday, January 21st,
19:00
UTC (CEST == UTC+2) and thus 2
28 matches
Mail list logo
