2008/12/18 Nathan Rixham :
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> and strongly typed returns.. nearly forgot
>
> public static function parseByte( Number $var ):bool {
> or
> public static function bool parseByte( Number $var ) {
>
> or such like
>
Theres already an RFC for this:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/typeh
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Dave Ingram wrote:
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
class MyTestClass {
public function blah(Foo $f);
public function blah(Bar $b);
public function blah($v);
}
Looks like you are using the wrong language, you need JAVA instead.
Yes, I'll admit it does look like Jav
Dave Ingram wrote:
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
class MyTestClass {
public function blah(Foo $f);
public function blah(Bar $b);
public function blah($v);
}
Looks like you are using the wrong language, you need JAVA instead.
Yes, I'll admit it does look like Java (or any C++-like OO
Dave Ingram wrote:
I remember that multiple signatures was said to have a possible very
difficult implementation. However, a similar behaviour can be achieved by
some instanceof().
I thought it probably would be awkward, but we do already have some type
hinting that can also be accomplis
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> class MyTestClass {
>> public function blah(Foo $f);
>> public function blah(Bar $b);
>> public function blah($v);
>> }
>>
>
> Looks like you are using the wrong language, you need JAVA instead.
>
Yes, I'll admit it does look like Java (or any C++-like OO
> I remember that multiple signatures was said to have a possible very
> difficult implementation. However, a similar behaviour can be achieved by
> some instanceof().
>
I thought it probably would be awkward, but we do already have some type
hinting that can also be accomplished with instanceo
Dave Ingram escribió:
> class MyTestClass {
> public function blah(Foo $f);
> public function blah(Bar $b);
> public function blah($v);
> }
Looks like you are using the wrong language, you need JAVA instead.
--
"We have art in order not to die of the truth" - Friedrich Nietzsche
Cristi
2008/12/18 Dave Ingram
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > while I'm here I may as well also ask about further adding type
> > hinting for the existing scalars and array.
> +1, but I don't know what might have stopped it being implemented before
> (time, parsing API changes, etc), so it woul
2008/12/18 Dave Ingram
>
> Also, what about this case:
>
> class MyTestClass {
> public function blah(Foo $f);
> public function blah(Bar $b);
> public function blah($v);
> }
>
> I would argue that the most specific function should be called, but how
> costly would that be to determine? What i
2008/12/18 Steph Fox :
> Hi Richard,
>
>> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
>> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> I make it 23, according to the info on that page...
>
>> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
>> se
No: http://derickrethans.nl/php_lags_23_seconds.php
Hm, Wikipedia's apparently less than open there -
[12:36] so how come PHP's different?
[12:36] olson has information on it, but it's never used
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Richard Quadling wrote:
> With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
>
> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is
Hi Richard,
In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
I make it 23, according to the info on that page...
So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
seconds behind UTC?
No.
This would be
Richard Quadling wrote:
> Hi.
>
> With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
>
> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
> seconds
Hi.
With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
seconds behind UTC?
Regards,
Richard
--
-
Nathan Rixham wrote:
> [...]
>
> while I'm here I may as well also ask about further adding type
> hinting for the existing scalars and array.
+1, but I don't know what might have stopped it being implemented before
(time, parsing API changes, etc), so it would be interesting to look
into the histo
Jay I. wrote:
> interesting idea, thanks. but unfortunately it won't help me as i really
> need to pass arrays as a single argument like this:
>
> my_func($param_1,$param_2,array(...));
You can do that. All parameters in a row with => will be merged to one
array.
You could call
myfunc($a
interesting idea, thanks. but unfortunately it won't help me as i really
need to pass arrays as a single argument like this:
my_func($param_1,$param_2,array(...));
i'm unaware of how to make patches for php so i wonder is it possible to
add a dollar sign shortcut for array keyword. like this:
my
jay wrote:
> okey. another syntax:
> myfunc($('key1'=>'val1', 'key2'=>'val2', ...));
This has been discussed and rejected several times.
If you still want to be able to use this syntax you can use my patch at
http://cschneid.com/php/
including a script to convert from and to this syntax.
19 matches
Mail list logo
