> Try with IIS7 + FCGI, it is _fast_ :)
It's a "same-across-platforms" thing. Mostly to do with the fact we
use mod-rewrite. :(
>> PHP is so much slower on windows, though a lot of it has to do with
>> file handling, a Windows specific slowdown I guess.
>
> That's something I really to fix for 5.
Good to know. And it makes it easier to use the Apache builds from
http://apachelounge.com.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, contrary to what many believe, 32bit PHP tends to perform better
> than 64bit PHP.
> So unless there's a really good reason why
Btw, contrary to what many believe, 32bit PHP tends to perform better
than 64bit PHP.
So unless there's a really good reason why you want 64bit I wouldn't
waste too much time on that.
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 200
hi Steve,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:26 AM, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
>> they have began the move to VC9. VC9 Apache builds can be fetched from
>> http://apachelounge.com, they are known to work very well.
>
> Hmm.. that i
> None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
> they have began the move to VC9. VC9 Apache builds can be fetched from
> http://apachelounge.com, they are known to work very well.
Hmm.. that is a good link. I had forgotten about them. Ideally, I'd
like to get a all 64bit se
hi!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:56 AM, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's great! I like all the different builds. Two things that pop
> out: 1) What are some recommended non-official builds of Apache2 in
> x64?
None yet, I still have to create some. Apache may provide some when
they have beg
That's great! I like all the different builds. Two things that pop
out: 1) What are some recommended non-official builds of Apache2 in
x64? and 2) Will there be PECL builds also?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Johannes has packed PHP 5.3.0
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Arnaud Le Blanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 02 September 2008 12:15:02 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >
> > Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > >>> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is a proposed fix for http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=453
Okay, I'm a totally newbie to this forum except for a few posts
related to the upload hooks some weeks ago.
I'm a PRO web-developer and uses PHP as the main scripting language.
Rasmus Lerdorf answered my post with something like:
"All storage modules should be able to use the upload hooks"
I wou
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Hartmut Holzgraefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mangol Smith wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to debug my extension.It says that PHP is built with debug
>> flag,
>> but my not my extenison. I used --enable-debug for PHP build. But, in the
>> extension I wrote I can't find any
hi Scott,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random pseudo byte
> function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the bytes aren't considered
> cryptographically strong, I am however consid
Hi Jan!
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Jan Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Zitat von Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Windows binaries (optimized for various versions of Windows) are available
>> from the new website dedicated to PHP's windows binaries:
>> http://windows.php.
On 03.09.2008, at 03:08, Scott MacVicar wrote:
Hi All,
Attached and uploaded [1] is a patch to add the OpenSSL random
pseudo byte function, at the moment it will return FALSE if the
bytes aren't considered cryptographically strong, I am however
considering making this parameter controlle
13 matches
Mail list logo
